Why can't instructions be made clearer to CommunityCensus Project participants?
In the examples I have encountered relating to the 1911 census I have found - apart from the duplication problem - all married women seem to have been added in their married names.
Surely this issue can be escalated to a senior FamilySearch employee, so that action can be taken to ensure these projects have firm project instructions and stricter checking and supervising arrangements?
I have now merged her with GVC1-33F. In fairness, I only created this profile today, so duplication is not the problem in this example. However, it took me just five minutes to find details of her marriage to Robert, and hence to discover Margaret Ann's maiden name.
Oh, and also to find Robert Wrightson had been wrongly indexed as Robert Wrighton - although that error is a Find My Past issue!