I enjoy using the review option and look forward to teaching classes on it at our local family history center in the near future. I think it will be great for new people looking to index. Much easier to teach and learn, especially as beginner indexing options have been difficult to find lately.
I really appreciate the questions/answers that have come forward by others asking about specific examples as it is helpful for know how to handle these situations, especially as the information is a little different than indexing. Especially when it comes from a "mod."
As I been working on some, I do have a couple of suggestions.
1- When flagging something as "transaction error" the default shows as "not readable" on the computer platform. This defaulted check doesn't go away if another option is selected, it must be click to unchecked. It would be nice if once some other option was selected the "not readable" would uncheck automatically.
2- When flagging as "transaction error" on the computer, it might be easier to clearly understand the intent if "not a name" was changed to show "not a person" (as it shows on the iPhone app). Sometimes the highlighted area is technically a name- a name of a county, a name of a company, etc. But not a person's name.
Thanks for the great opportunity!
ctr sweetie ✭✭✭
Thank you, @Tamara Stevenson , for your feedback and helpful suggestions. Engineers and product teams are reviewing the feedback and will continue to improve the experience. We are working on an FAQ knowledge article (KA) that will answer many of the questions that have been asked. Thank you for you trying out the new review activities.0
One of the options for the flag transaction on the computer might be "incorrect highlight" indicating more than one line is incorrectly included in the highlight.1