Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Family Tree

Error - circular links in database

DavidSmith379
DavidSmith379 ✭
February 26 edited February 26 in Family Tree

I have not seen any articles referring to how to deal with this. I encountered a circular link error in the database where an individual appears again as his own great-great-great grandfather. This shows a grandson lived 925-978AD but his grandfather lived 1030-1110AD. I believe the erroneous pointer is in record GDKD-WGV which points to its father being GZLL-8H1.

The circle goes as follows (also refer to the attached screenshot):

Circular link problem.png

GZLL-8H1

GZLL-ZCY

9CXZ-QDV

9CWH-RRL

GDKD-WGV

GZLL-8H1 (and then repeats as above)

I do not know how to correct this and I do not know the correct father record to which GDKD-WGV should be pointing. Please advise.

0

Answers

  • Paul W
    Paul W ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 26

    @DavidSmith379

    Unless you have proven ancestral links I would try to avoid records going this far back. I have found they often have warning flags along the lines of the mother not being old enough to bear children (at 2 years of age!) and lead to issues such as you have found.

    I think these records have often been created / amended by individuals who have nothing better to do with their time. A shame, but inputs like these reflect badly on the Family Tree project. Unfortunately, FamilySearch just does not have the resources to monitor the whole Tree and it is down to individuals users to decide whether it is worth working on these records.

    As I've implied, I would leave them alone, unless they are somehow having a detrimental effect on your research. Many entries in Family Tree transpire to relate to fictional characters - like the example I found of a large branch containing mythical Scandinavian kings and queens.

    If you try to put everything right in Family Tree you'll find yourself neglecting the far more important work you set out to do!

    0
  • Dennis J Yancey
    Dennis J Yancey ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 26 edited February 26

    I agree with Paul

    But if you are set on correcting it - - to break the circle simply remove the father of GDKD-WGV and leave it with no father if it is clearly impossible for the two have been father and son.

    see:

    https://www.familysearch.org/en/help/helpcenter/article/how-do-i-correct-parent-child-relationships-in-family-tree


    do you have any original sources that go back that far??? about 1,000 years ago.

    few people do.

    as Paul states

    stick to the people closer to you that you would be able to get good source documentation on.

    0
  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 27

    There is actually a Help Center article on exactly this type of problem ("looping pedigree"): https://www.familysearch.org/en/help/helpcenter/article/how-do-i-solve-a-looping-pedigree-in-family-tree

    Learning how to fix this error may be a perfect use for these extremely-early profiles (which may as well be fiction anyway).

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 22.7K All Categories
  • 363 1950 US Census
  • 46K FamilySearch Help
  • 91 Get Involved
  • 2.3K General Questions
  • 329 Family History Centers
  • 324 FamilySearch Account
  • 3.2K Family Tree
  • 2.5K Search
  • 3.6K Indexing
  • 433 Memories
  • 4.3K Temple
  • 250 Other Languages
  • 28 Community News
  • 5.3K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups