Bad document link for Eide Lutzens (G3M9-985)
This morning I found that one of Eide's sources links to a bad record (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QPNG-LHDT). Listed on the sources page, it is the record with "Tide" as his first name.
I wanted to find the correct record so that I could put a link to it, but even when I go in through the catalogue the records have been indexed--also to the wrong pages.
It appears that the correct record (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSDD-7689) which is attached is to Film # 102744414--which is not one of the film numbers listed on the search results page for Germany, Preußen, Schleswig-Holstein, Tondern, Neukirchen - Church records.
I'll make a note on the source which has the wrong resulting page, but is there a way to fix that link?
Thanks,
Kari Marshall
Best Answer
-
It's weird: film 105488823 (the one that the index entry is linked to) is not in the catalog at all. Searching for it gives "no results found". And it's totally the wrong records -- the linked image is from 1810, while the index entry is from 1769.
I have no idea how such a mis-association happened, nor how (or whether) it can be fixed. What you can do is edit the citation on Eide's Sources tab, adding the correct image link to the Notes field.
(When dealing with a mis-indexed name, I often revise the source title, putting the error in quotes: "Tide Lutzens" in "Germany, Lutheran Baptisms..." index, Neukirchen 1769, for example.)
(Note that I think the family name is correctly Lutzen: the phrasing is basically "Eide, Christian Lutzen's son", that is, the -s is the possessive, not part of the name.)
1