Utah Divorce records
I am reviewing Utah Divorce records Batch MS1V-MHD. The instructions state that if multiple documents for the same individual appear on the same image to combine the information into one entry. If they appear on separate images to index them separately.
Image 2 of this batch is a continuation of the document in Image 1. Should it be separately indexed or should it be marked NED and any pertinent information be included with Image 1? This doesn't fit any of the situations above and there were no specific instructions for a continued document for this project as has been the case in other projects.
Answers
-
Your question will be forwarded to the indexing team for review and assistance. You may be contacted by that team if they need more information.
0 -
In looking at the project instructions on What to remember about this project you can see this information on the third bullet down.
- If multiple documents for the same divorce appear on the same image, combine the information into a single entry. If multiple documents for the same divorce appear on separate images, do not combine the information into a single entry. Index each image separately.
So with this image with Issac and Ann since they are on separate images you would have a total of 3 entries indexed with the information on those specific images.
Hopefully that will make sense. We index based on the instructions given to us by the record owner.
Thank you for helping Index. That helps so many find records about their ancestors.
1 -
I understand those instructions but this is not a separate document - it is the second page of the first. That's why I asked. It is a bit different than the instructions actually address.
Thanks for your response.
0