Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› General Questions

Are we Guests or Members?

Paul W
Paul W ✭✭✭✭✭
October 16, 2021 in General Questions

Moderators are starting to use the expression "(Dear) Guest" in reply to queries posted here. Is this now the "official" FamilySearch term for those of us labelled as (just) "Members" on our Activity page? Seems a trivial point, but - similarly - I never know whether to say "engineer", "developer", or "programmer"!

0

Answers

  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    October 16, 2021

    @Paul W

    Paul

    Just my thoughts ...

    Regardless, of the term/expression of "Guest", used by the "Moderators" [ ie. 'FamilySearch' "Support" (Personnel) ] ...

    The 'lowly' Users/Patrons, like ourselves, in this "Community.FamilySearch" Forum, are ALL ... Participants.

    The "Community.FamilySearch" Forum was originally established on the basis of ...

    Users/Patrons, HELPING / ASSITING, Users/Patrons

    And, the "Community.FamilySearch" Forum, has been quite successfully operating, that way for, a number of Years.

    Due, to the unfortunate 'Demise', of the 'FamilySearch' "Support" Case Management System, earlier this Year; and, with not immediate alternative (ie. "System"), the 'FamilySearch' "Support" (Personnel), were basically "Moved" 'holus-bolus', WITHOUT any, "Knowledge" of; and/or, "Training" in, the "Community.FamilySearch" Forum.

    Many of the "Moderators" [ ie. 'FamilySearch' "Support" (Personnel) ] had never even participated in the "Community.FamilySearch" Forum, before the "Move".

    It has been a STEEP 'learning curve' ...

    We are NOT "Guests" in this "Community.FamilySearch" Forum ...

    We are Participants (or, members of the Forum) this "Community.FamilySearch" Forum ...

    Always have been, always will be ...

    Now ...

    As to the other matter ...

    The participation, in this "Community.FamilySearch" Forum, by the, "Product Managers"; "Programmers"/"Engineers"; "Designers"/"Developers"; and, the like, is even LESS, than that, in the OLD 'FamilySearch' ("GetSatisfaction") 'Feedback' Forum.

    But, the one thing that I have noticed, is that the, "Product Managers"; "Programmers"/"Engineers"; "Designers"/"Developers"; and, the like, GENERALLY, announce their "Position", in 'FamilySearch', within their particular posts. in this "Community.FamilySearch" Forum.

    [ But, sometimes, they do not ... ]

    That Said ...

    'Yes', it would certainly be, nice; and, helpful, if the "Product Managers"; "Programmers"/"Engineers"; "Designers"/"Developers"; and, the like, ALL had those "Badges" [ie. indicating their ACTUAL "Position" in 'FamilySearch'] alongside their "Contact Name", the SAME; as, that of the "Moderators"; and, "Administration" of the "Community.FamilySearch" Forum.

    As usual ...

    Just my thoughts.

    Brett

    ps: Take a look in the "Beta" (ie. "Test") Environment, for the "Community.FamilySearch" Forum.

    pps: 'FamilySearch' "Support", is being "Quarantined Off', somewhat - a definite 'Divide'/'Demarcation'.

    .

    2
  • MaureenE123
    MaureenE123 ✭✭✭✭
    October 17, 2021

    I agree with Brett's comments. "Guest" definitely has the connotation that we have first to be "invited in", and that we have no right to be there unless we have been invited in. But perhaps that is how FamilySearch views people with queries or people responding to the people's queries, not as participants?

    @Brett what is the URL for the Beta  "Community FamilySearch" Forum, as the pages I see do not have any mention of a Beta site, unless I am missing something.

    1
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    October 17, 2021

    @MaureenE123

    Maureen

    I would humbly suggest, perhaps that is how, 'FamilySearch' is "Training", the 'FamilySearch' "Support" (Personnel) ].

    Remember, the "Community.FamilySearch" Forum, has been operating quite successfully, for, a number of Years; BEFORE, the unfortunate 'Demise', of the 'FamilySearch' "Support" Case Management System, earlier this Year; and, INCLUSION of the 'FamilySearch' "Support", into the Forum; as, "Moderators".

    And ...

    Ultimately, technically, EVERYONE (ie. ALL Users/Patrons), is a "Guest", of 'FamilySearch'; and, that includes, Employees and Missionary/Volunteers, who use 'FamilySearch' for themselves, in their own right; as, WE are ALL Users/Patrons, "Guests".

    But ...

    That Said ...

    That is too "High Level" ...

    Lets crank it down, a notch or two ...

    How about, in this "Community.FamilySearch" Forum; WE, the 'lowly' Users/Patrons, ARE all Participants.

    Now ...

    On the other matter ...

    Easy, in plain sight, available for all ...

    In the "Beta" (ie. "Test") Environment; as, normal ...

    ▬ Select "Question Mark" in 'Circle ( ie. "Help" ) ...

    ▬ On the "Pop-Up" (ie. "Modal'') 'Window' of "Help"

    ▬ 'Down' the 'Bottom' ... "Community"

    ▬ Select "Community" ... then, "Sign In".

    Voilà ...

    Good Luck.

    Brett

    1
  • Paul W
    Paul W ✭✭✭✭✭
    October 27, 2021

    The use of this term continues - and in most cases continues to be totally inappropriate!

    Since it is mostly used by moderators, perhaps one could address this point, by advising if there has been instruction to refer to users / participants / members as "guests". The only situation where I would feel it to be a suitable expression is when applied to a visitor to a Family History Centre or the FHL.

    1
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    October 27, 2021

    @Paul W

    Its 'Brett'.

    FYI

    At a "Family History Centre" of the Church, those who visit, for research/learning purposes, are "Patrons".

    And, when we, were visiting, the "Family History Library" (FHL), in 'Temple Square", Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, for research purposes, on the whole, the inference was that we were "Patrons", not that anyone really referred to us as such, they (all the Staff; and Volunteers) simply/kindly helped/assisted us, if we needed such.

    Brett

    2
  • Paul W
    Paul W ✭✭✭✭✭
    October 27, 2021

    @Brett .

    Funnily enough, I decided to omit "patron" from my ("more appropriate") alternative expressions, as I was once castigated (on the GetSat forum) for using it! My critic insisted "patron" should only be used to apply to people who provided financial support to charities and the like. True, that does seem to be a prime definition, but (like you) I would find it quite correct to use in this context.

    2
  • Orr Rozi
    Orr Rozi mod
    October 27, 2021
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/386403#Comment_386403

    Here is a link to the beta site: Welcome to the FamilySearch Community! — FamilySearch Community

    1
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 28.5K All Categories
  • 22.9K FamilySearch Help
  • 114 Get Involved
  • 2.6K General Questions
  • 424 FamilySearch Center
  • 432 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.2K Family Tree
  • 3.2K Search
  • 4.5K Indexing
  • 592 Memories
  • 6.1K Temple
  • 309 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.4K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups