Searching Chinese characters with Wildcards stopped working
[Originally from https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/573000]
Based on
we should be able to use an asterisk (*) for multiple characters or a question mark (?) for a single character.It worked before so I have several bookmarks, for example "searching for someone named 李段* whose father is 李爾*"
Unfortunately they stopped working since a few months ago. Now it says "No Results Found".
Also it looks like the wildcard stopped working with Chinese characters in general, not just for a specific character.
- Another bookmark for "李普* whose father is 李光*". It used to work and now return nothing as well. https://www.familysearch.org/search/tree/results?count=100&q.fatherGivenName=%E5%85%89%2A&q.fatherGivenName.exact=on&q.fatherSurname=%E6%9D%8E&q.fatherSurname.exact=on&q.givenName=%E6%99%AE%2A&q.givenName.exact=on&q.sex=Male&q.surname=%E6%9D%8E&q.surname.exact=on
- While searching for "伯*" it also returns "*伯". https://www.familysearch.org/search/tree/results?count=100&q.givenName=%E4%BC%AF%2A&q.givenName.exact=on&q.sex=Male&q.surname=%E6%9D%8E&q.surname.exact=on
Another pair of queries
- While searching with exact match it returns three results without wildcard. There should be 20+ rows. https://www.familysearch.org/search/tree/results?count=100&q.givenName=%2A%E7%B9%B9&q.givenName.exact=on&q.sex=Male&q.surname=%E6%9D%8E&q.surname.exact=on
- While searching without exact match it returns incorrect results since row 4. https://www.familysearch.org/search/tree/results?count=100&q.givenName=%2A%E7%B9%B9&q.sex=Male&q.surname=%E6%9D%8E
Anyone experience similar issues?
Risposte
-
A fix for this is underway. If it still doesn't work in a day or so, click the feedback button and let FamilySearch know.
0 -
-
I cleared cookies and disabled extensions, and now it stopped showing "Something Went Wrong" and it shows "No Results Found".
I removed the father part and it returns three exact match records, which means wildcard doesn't work.
If I remove exact match, it returns a lot of unrelated records.
Anyway, just want to update the thread and shows that still it doesn't work as expected.
0 -
Hi leeym,
Thank you for reporting this issue! We believe the problem was addressed with a fix implemented yesterday. Could you please try performing your searches again and let us know if everything is now working as expected?
We appreciate your patience and help in confirming.
Thanks,
0 -
Hi, Brian,
Half of them work as expected if the wildcard matches all trailing characters.
However, it still shows "No Results Found" when trying to use the wildcard to match leading characters.
Hopefully we can make it work for both.
Thanks
0