Stuck-burial translation help- Fehmarn Germany 1807
This is part of what I think the burial says-
Hedwig Catharina Stuck, in Bisdorf, vather _____ Jul 1804/ Detlev Offenborn in Gronwoldhoft in __ Cismar, mutter named not known.
She __ 1804 married Schuster Franz Jacob Struck, ___ in Bisdorf. living ____ kinder, __, 4 years wit Magdalene, _____ Stuck born;
3 lines I cannot read 1806 dec.
Anna Catharine ___ Stuck ___, __ Peter Carbuhn,
Lemkenhafen______ vater of kinder______ married? T.? J. Stuick _____; [3 more lines I cannot read]
2, Anna married wit Simon Hofeld, hauswirtz in Hinrichsdorf 2 kinders _____ son, 2 grandchildren and 5___
82 years and 6 mon old
it starts on this page and continues on next-
Thank you for any help you can give me. Cheryl Nath
Commenti
-
What a grim story. Blanks filled in in bold -
[image 925]
Hedwig Catharina Stuck, in Bisdorf, her father, according to statements and the marriage register /Jul 1804/ Detlev Offenborn in Grönwoldhoft im Amte Cismar, her mother's name is not mentioned.
She has been married since 1804 to the shoemaker Franz Jacob Struck, currently hired hand in Bisdorf. From this person [meaning Hedwig] there are two living children, the oldest with the name Magdalene was already born before her marriage to the said Stück, nevertheless he allowed himself to be viewed as her father thereafter and therefore she uses his surname. But he did not want to acknowledge the younger one / see Bapt[ism]-Prot[ocol] 1806 Dec[ember] / named Anna Catharine, because he wanted to prove that Peter Carbuhn from Lemkenhafen was the father of this child, which the deceased claimed.
Therefore the latter lived in constant discord and open feuding with her husband, the said F. J. Stück, was often abused and beaten by him, and even complained to me that he threated to poison her.
[image 926 is duplicate of 925, so record continues on 927]
[image 927]
She did not want to take my advice to make the necessary report to the authorities. Therefore her sudden death, as well as his behavior towards her during her illness, qualifies this as a suspicious death which, according to the sovereign edict of 18 September 1804, requires an autopsy, which was thereafter performed. The results of he examination are not yet known. The deceased was 23 years old and was quietly buried using alms.
1 -
Addition (Note in the left column):
Nothing significant has come to light [in the autopsy].
1