Incorrect standardized place names
Discussion List
-
Request to correct geographical indexing in Tennessee 1870 and 1880 U.S. CensusesTennessee has 95 counties that are subdivided into numerical Civil Districts, which are used as the… -
Three more damaged placename standardizations to be fixed (plus many associated ones?)All three from "Ireland Civil Registration, 1845-1913" index. Civil birth registrations … -
1950 Census Richmond, Richmond County incorrectly assigned to Richmond, Ontario, NYHere is another placename standardization issue https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:6XT2-RQ…
-
City of Denver County of Denver--Almost correct but not quiteIn 1902, Denver, which was formerly in Arapahoe county, Colorado, became part of the county of Denv…
-
Standardised Place NamesI have recently started using the Family Tree on FamilySearch and have come across a familiar probl…
-
Errors in Historical Records Place Name UpdatesCommunity Members: I have created a post under Ideas>Sources as a place to report incorrect auto…
-
Fix Place names- New Volunteer opportunity- 2 quirksIssue #1 I have noticed when I do the "fix place names" volunteer opportunity and choose …Answered ✓ Closed deborahniven1 255 views 3 comments 0 points Most recent by deborahniven1 General Questions
-
5Create Official Statement from FamilySearch regarding perceived Indexing Errors - Standardized PlaceThere are so many people complaining about bad indexing and indexers not entering the correct data …