Records- report image issue
The records in the link below are correct until image 94.
Image 95 was missed, than all the following images were mismatched.
It is not a new idea, but I did not know how to address this mistake.
Thanks a lot for everything.
Answers
-
The image number does not match the page number because of the unnumbered pages at the beginning of the image series for the cover and the inside front which are Images 1 and 2.
After that, every image is a number 2 digits higher than the number written on the page.
I don't notice a missing page.
0 -
Modulo the partial corrections that have been made, yep, the image-to-index associations are off by one. Image 95 features Marcelino Del Fiume, who has now been added on the Image Index sidebar, but his indexed family members are still from the Oliveira family.
The rest of that family is on image 96, where Jose Francisco de Oliveira is the groom, but the index sidebar says Antonio Cesar Fidalgo.
Antonio Cesar Fidalgo's marriage is actually on the next image (97).
(Egads, this viewer is beyond annoying. I have to re-do the zoom Every. Single. Time!)
I have no idea how to get this fixed. I would actually hold off on manual corrections, because they're likely to make a large-scale correction much more difficult. (Either that, or they'd be rendered incorrect by such a fix.)
I wonder if the "Feedback" side-tab would go to the right people?
1 -
I couldn't even get the names to display. Thanks for your diligence in digging at this, @Julia Szent-Györgyi
0 -
@Áine Ní Donnghaile, it's much easier to figure out what's going on using the catalog's viewer (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSVS-KG21?i=95&cc=2765317).
In the new viewer, if the side panel is closed, you can open it using the approximately-middle mystery button, with the tooltip of "open panel".
If the side panel is open but showing an individual's entry rather than the full page's index, you have to click the back arrow (not the X) in the blue bar at the top.
What I haven't figured out is any way to get it to STAY at the zoom I want. Grrr.
1 -
Yes, I'm a big fan of the catalog viewer, too. I was possibly also misled by a post that said the "records were correct until" but there was no mention that the INDEX was correct until.
0 -
@Julia Szent-Györgyi I agree that having to adjust the zoom is frustrating. I have reported the zoom level issue, and I will let you know when I hear back on that one. Also, thanks for bringing up the Feedback tab. It can be used any time there is a problem with an image.
@Silvani Teixeira, the Feedback tab on the left side of the image page allows you to send a message to the team working on the images. Click the tab and choose an emoji. Then a box will appear where you can leave details about the problem.
0 -
At some point in the wee hours, I thought of another reason not to do anything to the index manually: those index entries are correct as-is (except for any misreadings/typos) -- they're just not linked to the correct image. If you leave the index untouched, then the index detail pages are all (mostly) correct except for one number. Only image 95's index needs correction: it needs Mr. Del Fiume's marriage to be added to the index. It'll just look like it's a two-records-per-page register for that one image.
Oh, and the associations are correct again starting with image 142. (Mr. Berteli's marriage was indexed twice, not quite the same way: https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:6X89-QFXH and https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:6X89-QFN9.)
0
