Home› Ask a Question› Family Tree

Parents of George A. Chrisman 1765 - 1850

ScottHindes1
ScottHindes1 ✭
July 7, 2021 edited July 18, 2024 in Family Tree

Family Search lists George A. Chrisman's parents as Michael Christmann 1726 - 1780 & Elizabeth Seitz 1741 - 1784.

Ancestry's eight out of nine listed "contributors" note his parents were Jacob A. Chrismon 1706 - 1778 & Magdalena Heydt (Hite). The ninth lists Michael & Elizabeth.

George A. Chrismon's son, Charles Crismon 1807 - 1890, was very prominent in establishing the Mormon community in SLC, San Bernardino and Mesa, AZ.

I would appreciate if you would cross check your records to verify the correctness of George A. Chrisman's parents.

Tagged:
  • confirming parents
0

Comments

  • ScottHindes1
    ScottHindes1 ✭
    July 7, 2021

    I am F. Scott Hindes (hindes57@me.com) and the great great-grandson of George A. Chrisman 1765 - 1850

    0
  • Sanra
    Sanra ✭✭✭✭
    July 9, 2021

    Hello Scott,

    We found George A Chrisman, LCCG-JRS, has parent listed as Michael Chrisman. He has one source dated 1791, called Transcription of the deed showing George Christman of Mecklenberg Co., NC was the son of Michael Christman, Sr. O Mecklenburg Co., NC. (You likely know this already.)

    We also found John George Chrisman II, LH56-R5Z, who is the child of Jacob Andrew Chrisman Sr, and Magdalena Hite. Plus another set of parents. This George also has a son named Charles, but the dates seem to be off.

    You may want to see if you can find something by searching for his name, under Search, Records.

    We wonder if the Historical Society in North Carolina might be able to help you, if they have information that far back.

    You might also want to contact the Family History Library, and schedule a 20 minute consultation, to see if they have suggestions.

    Use the link below:

    https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Virtual_Genealogy_Consultations

    Good luck.

    1
  • Caryl
    Caryl ✭✭
    July 10, 2021

    Another note in addition to the ones posted. Here is an article that can be found in the Help Center that explains when you see Family search as the contributor. Family Search is not the actual contributor.

    https://www.familysearch.org/help/helpcenter/article/why-is-familysearch-a-contributor-in-family-tree


    It is generally information brought over from another system (such as new.familysearch.org) - due to programming it shows as Family Search as the contributor because to show each individual name while converting to a new or newer system can be very complex

    2
  • Dale Linda Hein
    Dale Linda Hein ✭✭✭
    July 11, 2021 edited July 12, 2021

    Scott,

    Here is some additional information that might help you find answers.   If you go to the Latest Changes for George A. Chrisman, you will see that the parents you think are his were added to him on June 13, 2012 by FamilySearch, so someone else before 2012 also thought they are his parents.  Caryl explained to you why it shows FamilySearch added the information.  

    https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/changelog/LCCG-JRS

    And since they are not his parents on his page now, it means someone removed them.  You could look through the rest of the changes coming forward and find who removed them, and then send them a message asking if they have some information that led them to believe they were not the parents. If they are his parents, and all of the birth dates are correct, his mother would have been 52 and there would have been many years between George A. and their last child showing now.

    Going through the Latest Changes can often help us unravel problems like this. This article has some good information about that.

    https://www.familysearch.org/help/helpcenter/article/how-do-i-see-what-changes-have-been-made-about-a-person-in-family-tree

    We also wanted to mention that the fact that 8 say the parents are  Jacob A. Chrismon 1706 - 1778 & Magdalena Heydt (Hite) can seem like very compelling evidence, and if those trees are well-sourced it would be. But there is always a possibility that 7 people copied the wrong tree of one person and then all posted them as their tree. Other people’s trees are great for clues, but those clues should always be verified with actual historical record sources. Additional research, as suggested by others, would be the way to go, and then if you need to change his parents in the tree, you can do that.

    We hope you are able to find at least one good source.

    1
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 44.7K Ask a Question
  • 3.6K General Questions
  • 598 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.8K Get Involved
  • 676 FamilySearch Account
  • 7K Family Tree
  • 5.5K Search
  • 1.1K Memories
  • 504 Other Languages
  • 66 Community News
  • Groups