Home› Groups› Austro-Hungarian Empire Research

Austro-Hungarian Empire Research

Join

I need a translation of microfilm 624149, DGS 4703373, image 50, line item #250 for the right note.

ZsirosStephenLeslie1
ZsirosStephenLeslie1 ✭
May 13, 2021 edited October 9, 2024 in Social Groups

The birth of Julianna Megyeri on May 15, 1877 shows an illegitimate birth to Maria Megyeri. A Maria Megyeri also had illegitimate children born in 1872 and 1876 in Ujcsanalos. Would this be the same parent? Translating might shed some light on the situation.


Thank You.

Steve

0

Best Answer

  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    May 13, 2021 Answer ✓

    250. Born 10, baptised 17 May 1877.

    Julianna, female, illegitimate

    Parents: Mária Megyeri, Reformed servant

    Residence: Kerepesi road 567

    Godparents: [blank]

    Midwife: Anna Krausz

    Officiant: ditto (Béla Szilágyi assistant pastor)

    Remarks: The child was legitimized by the marriage of the Ev. Reform. mother with the natural father, the Roman Catholic Florián Hegyi, on 3 March 1880 in Budapest. Entered per decree number 54519/900 of ?? ?? and number 1089/900 of the ?? Reformed bishop. Dated in Budapest, ? Dec(?) 1901.

    ---

    I did not find the referenced marriage in the Calvin Square church's records, but in any case, I think this Mária Megyeri in central Budapest is exceedingly unlikely to have any relevance whatsoever to anyone in Ujcsanálos in Zemplén county.

    0

Answers

  • Mckenna Cooper
    Mckenna Cooper ✭✭✭
    May 13, 2021

    Image 50 on that film is 1813 births for Selyeb...I don't think you have the right film number. Can you provide a link to the document you want translation help with?

    0
  • ZsirosStephenLeslie1
    ZsirosStephenLeslie1 ✭
    May 13, 2021

    link is "Hungary Reformed Church Christenings, 1624-1895," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:939K-RLSX-59?cc=1858355 : 24 May 2019), > image 1 of 1; Országos Leveltár, Budapest (Hungary National Archives, Budapest).

    0
  • ZsirosStephenLeslie1
    ZsirosStephenLeslie1 ✭
    May 13, 2021

    Sorry - the film should be 4703733, image 50 (of 660).


    Thanks

    Steve

    0
  • ZsirosStephenLeslie1
    ZsirosStephenLeslie1 ✭
    May 13, 2021

    Thank you for the information. It is really a big help.

    0
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories