Home› Groups› Belgium, Luxembourg, and The Netherlands Research

Belgium, Luxembourg, and The Netherlands Research

Join

https://www.openarch.nl/rar:713ae09c-6a00-d38e-3f14-a33b4b8417ef lists two children (Agnes Agnes Pie

kaylymandavis1
kaylymandavis1 ✭
December 24, 2020 edited December 29, 2020 in Social Groups
https://www.openarch.nl/rar:713ae09c-6a00-d38e-3f14-a33b4b8417ef lists two children (Agnes Agnes Pietronella de Lang 15 Jan 1928 and Wilhelmus Henricus de Lang 3 Aug 1930) they are listed with the family of Wilhelmus de Land and Wilhelmine de Graauw

the mother (de Graauw) is too hold to have been their mother. I have finished researching the other children and can not find a connection. How do the two children fit into the family?

 

thanks in advance

 

Kay L. Davis

Tagged:
  • Implemented
  • New
  • Record Viewing
  • Record Searching
0

Answers

  • Adrien Kintziger
    Adrien Kintziger ✭✭✭
    December 25, 2020

    Do you have the number of the specific scan? , not the page number , the actual scan.?

    0
  • kaylymandavis1
    kaylymandavis1 ✭
    December 28, 2020

    Adrien: I am confused. I guess in don't know the difference between the scan number nd the page number. Can you explain this to me?

     

    thanks

     

    Kay Davis

    0
  • A van Helsdingen
    A van Helsdingen ✭✭✭✭✭
    December 29, 2020

    The page number was 287. I had a look for this scan, but page 287 wasn't scanned. The children born between 1928 and 1936 are less than 100 years old, therefore the page cannot be published for privacy reasons. If the 100 year rule remains, the page can be published either on 20 January 2036 or 1 January 2037.

     

    I found a marriage between Wilhelmus de Lang and Johanna Kooyman/Kooijman https://www.openarch.nl/rar:1a05533f-104e-5ffc-8fa0-68bff14dbf32

     

    I also found the marriage between Johannes de Lang and Johanna Wilhelmina Auwens https://www.openarch.nl/gld:158356A3-64F1-4264-85F5-9DE34C76EA4A

     

    So this was evidently a three generation family. The children from 1928-1933 must be Wilhelmus', and the others could be either Johannes' or Wilhelmus'.

     

    We are not supposed to have seen this information about people born less than 100 years ago. If these people are still alive and complain, OpenArch would be in serious trouble. I filed an Error Report to OpenArch and suggested they delete the people less than 100 years ago immediately. I've attached a copy of the record in case they delete it before you have a chance to look at it again. Screenshot (89) 

    It may be possible to get a copy of the original Population Registration record with the people born under a 100 years ago redacted. You would need to contact Regionaal Archief Rivierenland and be prepared to wait due to the pandemic and to pay a fee.

    0
  • Adrien Kintziger
    Adrien Kintziger ✭✭✭
    December 29, 2020

    Fortunately , Mr Van Helsdingen stumbled upon the issue with missing pages and scans.I also tried other

    names on the branch , to browse those books , and indeed, several pages are missing not scanned/placed out of order.In most cases Kay,the correct page is either highlighted in a colored frame.They also have a page number in the book itself.

    Anyway,Given the answer of Mr Van Helsdingen,you have a full basket now...

    Adrie

    0
  • Adrien Kintziger
    Adrien Kintziger ✭✭✭
    December 29, 2020

    As the scans are missing, i'm not convinced that publishing the date of birth and name only would violate

    the 100 year rule.(In Belgium they moved the tier to 120 yrs), as an aside.

     

    Can you keep us informed about the answer they come up with?.........

     

    Adrie

     

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories