Quality of parental link
The system appears to focus on the individual, and that's great I love it, but it doesn't focus on one of the most important aspects and that is the connection between parent to child. That's where loops occur and other fun stuff. It's not just sources but types of sources, is there a birth certificate or just relying on a census entry? Is there a misattributed parental event proved by DNA? And so on. That becomes the real quality, do we have the links in the tree correct.
I know we aren't there yet, but thoughts would be good on how to create a parental quality link score
0
Comments
-
@DGrawrock a ticket has been created for this suggestion :)
0
This discussion has been closed.