After normal child-bearing years for a male
John Debour was a male who, apparently, married somewhat late in life. The profile score throws many errors for John being after normal child-bearing years when his children were born. If the algorithm is using a woman's normal child-bearing years for a man, a correction is needed. I also find it odd that the children are not listed in birth order in the error list. https://www.familysearch.org/service/tree/tree-data/labs/person-scores/GDL3-44P/summary
Thanks.
Comments
-
I see this issue is still present. Looking at the profile of my GGF, 9J27-DJS, he is presented as being too old to have fathered most of the children of his 2nd marriage. His wife, my GGM, was considerably younger, and surely it is HER age that matters when it comes to those births:
Thank you.
0 -
But at least we can dismiss these now. Just click on the notice then click dismiss.
I do agree, however, that it would be nice to have a higher limit on age and number of children so you would not have to click and dismiss six times here.
0 -
@Gordon Collett and it still bothers me that the children are not listed in chronological order.
0 -
Created TREEINT-47 to track the childbearing years for male issue
Are you proposing the following for sorted order?
- Catherine Margaret
- Sarah Lauretta
- Patrick James
- Margaret
- Paul Francis
0 -
Thank you.
That birth order works or the reverse, with the latest-born child first. They just need to be in order. Scattered, as they are now, would make it much harder for someone to evaluate the information in the error message.
0 -
Here is the ticket number for the sorting request - PQS-21
0 -
Thanks, @roberthparker3
0 -
I'm running into this same problem. A male who married older to a 2nd wife. This will come up many times with the pioneer polygamists. Also showing as a male they are "too old" to have fathered children at 41. It seems to be using the same criteria as females.
0 -
Update: ages and rules have been adjusted.
1
