This 1760 Töstrup Taufen record challenges me... Hilfe, bitte
The handwriting is particularly challenging for me with this Taufen record. Please help.
TRANSCRIPTION:
Hans Henningsen [_?_] Vog. [Vogelsang?] Suye Hansen Tochter__ Anna Margareta ist? am 10th February getauft___. Der? gev.? [gevattern?] sind? [_?_] Anna Margareta [_?_] Peter Henningsen [_?_] [_?_] [_?_] Hans Christ.? Heiser das [_?_] Rundholz? [_?_] Margr. Doroth. Hansen[ __4 words?__]
Archion.de permalink: http://www.archion.de/p/e83d8e4cb9/
Best Answers
-
really difficult.... below some additions to your transcription:
Hans Henningsen Krüger? [_?_] Vog. [Vogelsang?] Sinje Hansen Töchterlein Anna Margareta ist am 10ten Februar getauft worden. Die gev. [gevattern] sind gewesen Anna Marg. [_?_] Peter Henningsen [_?_] [_?_] [_?_] Hans Ernst? Heiser das [_?_] Rundholz? [_?_] Margr. Doroth. Hansen [ __4 words?__]
1 -
@Robt_Nielsen, below are some additions to Ulrich's transcription:
Hans Henningsen Krüger [innkeeper] in Vog. [Vogelsang] Sinje Hansen Töchterlein
Anna Margareta ist am 18t Februar getauft worden.
Die gev. [gevattern] sind gewesen Anna Marg. des alt[en] Peter Hen
ningsen v[on] Drult [Drült] Frau[,] 2 Hans E[r]nst Heiser des Hsce[?] [in the last entry on the previous page (same image), there's a Brarup "Hrsch.," possibly meaning Herrschaft; so "Hsce" might mean "herrschaftliche," which is "lordly"]
auf Rundh [Rundhof] Bender [cooper] [or Bruder/brother; but the second little doesn't look like his usual "r"] 3. Margr Doroth Hansen
bey Henn.[?] Jorth [i.e., name of the person whose household she serves in; compare with the "J" in "Jacob" in entry 7 on image 65] dienend.
I'm seeing what looks like another child of this couple in 1756; see the first entry (www.archion.de/p/394b1a213b/). The mother there is listed as Lassen, but in their 1750 marriage (first entry, www.archion.de/p/c7867ce763/) she is listed as the daughter of Hans Lassen, so her surname may be written either as Lassen (fixed surname) or Hansen (patronymic).
0
Answers
-
Thanks @Ulrich Neitzel !
0