https://community.familysearch.org/de/discussion/comment/606934#Comment_606934
項留言
-
@J Wolfgang R Binte could you add further comments as to what issue you are having?
0 -
My initial headline was:
Ist es eigentlich beabsichtigt alle Quellen erst zu indexieren ?? Oder warum diese Fehlermeldungen ?
.. later I learned that there is a special group for the data quality score feedback ..
So why is it a conflict if familysearch hasn´t yet indexed a source ?? and is it necessary to just (only) index sources if there is a possibility to put a "not linked person" (add unconnected person) into the tree ??
0 -
It's not a conflict. The message is saying that there is no indexed source to support that particular vital date and place. The problem with unindexed sources is that they have no data values that can be compared with the vital conclusion. So they provide no information that can be used by the Data Quality Score algorithm, even if they may contain excellent information that a human can see provides justification for the conclusion.
1 -
… by the way it is an indexed source, indexed (only) by ancestry .. I understand it´s just a technical "problem" .. unimportant for the user .. so why is it shown ?? What is he or she supposed to do about it ?
0 -
It's nice that it is indexed by Ancestry, but if that indexed data is not available to FamilySearch, it provides no help for the Data Quality Score algorithm. All sources tagged to the vital conclusion (in this case a residence) are shown on the right-hand side, regardless of whether they support the DQS. Even an unindexed source provides support for the conclusion, so it is helpful to show it.
0 -
Thank you for your comment ..
0
