首頁› 群組› Data Quality Score Feedback

Data Quality Score Feedback

加入

Burial Date: redundant at large

zella242
zella242 ✭
April 13, 2024 已編輯 June 1, 2024 於 Social Groups

Typically is an inaccurate/imprecise detail on profiles. Should be removed entirely from burial section and added as an event or fact for those specifically concerned with burial dates.

With regard to profile accuracy measure, this is not important.

2

項留言

  • MandyShaw1
    MandyShaw1 ✭✭✭✭✭
    April 13, 2024

    Where there is no death date known, the burial date if present does at least provide an upper bound (as for births and christenings), but then so does probate, which I don't think PQS checks (?)

    3
  • zella242
    zella242 ✭
    April 13, 2024

    You're right, I've seen that a couple of times. Maybe a better PQS check would be:

    If burial date exists and death date does not, then flag death date not populated

    0
  • Rhonda Budvarson
    Rhonda Budvarson ✭✭✭✭
    May 9, 2024

    @zella242 Thank you for your feedback. The word 'typically' has been removed from PQS suggestions.

    0
這個討論已經被關閉
Clear
No Groups Found

類別

  • 所有分類