Unknown error
This morning, I checked the profile of a great-grandmother, KPHB-7FB, who lived 1853-1940.
Once again, there is the error that isn't really an error of rural locations without a city/town.
In addition, there is an undefined error on the marriage regarding "missing_place_jurisdictions." The marriage is a County record, and I don't see any issues in the profile. The record has been indexed and attached many times.
Shouldn't the date from a birth record (or, in this case, from the Family Bible) be weighted over the vague and often inaccurate date/age in a census?
I'll concede my GGM was very old at 87 in 1940, but I don't consider 40 and 42 old for the births of Uncle Reagor in 1894 and Aunt Mary in 1896.
Thanks.
Comments
-
Update: We will be increasing the value that we use for advanced maternal age.
Regarding the place issues: those are still being looked at and haven't been resolved yet.
0 -
Upvote on the need to give birth information from birth records more weight than that from censuses.
0 -
@MandyShaw1 the newer message gives less weight to the age on censuses. The rewording is much better in that regard.
1 -
Update: the engineers sent another update through on 17 Apr 24. There were several fixes, hopefully taking care of these issues. Thank you for your continued patience :)
0
