Change the Way Ordinance Limits are Handled
I appreciate the need for limiting the number of names a user can reserve/print. Really, I do. We have an enthusiastic geneaologist or two who used to call "dibs" on every single name, so I am thankful for the implementation of limits. I am hoping however, that there might be a different way of handling it? I have six teens/young adults who are unendowed that would like to do baptisms. It is discouraging to make an appointment for my kids to go and then only be able to print 4 names. There isn't even one for each of them. I don't have a suggestion for a better way, I am just sad my kids are unable to do family names when we go.