Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Temple

Record is missing a birthplace but has a christening location

richardgordonbaird1
richardgordonbaird1 ✭
June 20, 2021 edited June 20, 2021 in Temple

Pretty much just as above, I'm just wondering if I can safely assume the birth and christening places are the same, or if I need to keep looking. I can't perform the sealing ordinance until it has a birthplace.

0

Best Answer

  • Wayland K Adams
    Wayland K Adams mod
    June 20, 2021 Answer ✓

    Hi - Please refer to:

    https://www.familysearch.org/help/helpcenter/article/what-information-is-required-to-do-temple-ordinances-for-my-ancestors

    This gives you the information required to perform ordinances. As you can see, a standard date and place for christening is sufficient. There is no need to assume a birthplace based on christening place. As stated, they are often the same but no always.

    2

Answers

  • CarolynLawrence1
    CarolynLawrence1 ✭✭
    June 20, 2021 edited June 20, 2021

    Hi, @richardgordonbaird1 you may want to do your best in finding the birthplace, but sometimes if the ancestor lived a long time ago the christening may have been just down the road from their birthplace. If you have one place but not the other, you could use it until you learn more, and change the accuracy of the birthplace if needed in the future.

    2
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 24.9K All Categories
  • 594 1950 US Census
  • 47.7K FamilySearch Help
  • 100 Get Involved
  • 2.4K General Questions
  • 373 Family History Centers
  • 367 FamilySearch Account
  • 3.5K Family Tree
  • 2.7K Search
  • 3.9K Indexing
  • 478 Memories
  • 4.9K Temple
  • 273 Other Languages
  • 30 Community News
  • 5.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups