Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Suggest an Idea

I don't know where to post this... I have a record that is incorrect. How do I alert someone?

ChristopherTemple-Watts
ChristopherTemple-Watts ✭
August 6, 2021 in Suggest an Idea

[https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q2MG-PZDQ]

In this records I am seeing an 8 year old cited as head of the household instead of the listed head.

How do I alert someone of this problem?

Tagged:
  • New
1
1
Up Down
1 votes

New · Last Updated August 6, 2021

Comments

  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    August 6, 2021 edited August 6, 2021

    @ChristopherTemple-Watts

    Christopher

    I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...

    I just 'looked' at that "Source" (and, the corresponding "Image") to which you have referenced.

    I am somewhat confused ...

    And, remember, I am just 'looking' at that link/URL that you provided ...

    I DO NOT 'see' an "8 Year Old"; as, the "Head" of the 'House Hold'.

    I ONLY see that "Samuel J. SMITH" ( Aged: 34 ); as, "Head" of the 'House Hold', both, in the "Index" & "Image".

    INDEX

    [ And, DO NOT worry about the ORDER of the "Other People in the Record", in the "Index".

    image.png

    IMAGE

    https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSQZ-X7GS-4?i=142

    Question: What am I missing?

    Please advise.

    Brett

    0
  • ChristopherTemple-Watts
    ChristopherTemple-Watts ✭
    August 6, 2021

    If you look at the Citation is says Samuel J Smith in the household of Evelyn Kingscote

    I actually was finding her sister, Mary when I saw this error.

    The citation really should reflect the facts and we, the end users, shouldn't be editing citations to correct them as I can see this is potentially a very slippery slope. Details are everything in genealogy!

    Just thought it needed to be corrected.

    0
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    August 6, 2021

    @ChristopherTemple-Watts

    Christopher

    Oh ...

    Right, the "Citation" ...

    As, you did not indicate that in your post, I did not specifically 'look' at that ...

    I NEVER worry about those "Citations", that much, any more.

    'Yes', that is odd; but, I wonder if, that was a "Citation", brought across from "FindMyPast", possibly.

    IF, that "Citation", was brought across, from "FindMyPast"; THEN, that "Citation" (or, part of it) would have to addressed/fixed in/through "FindMyPast".

    Whereas ...

    IF, that "Citation", was created, in 'FamilySearch'; THEN, 'Yes', that "Citation" (or, part of it) SHOULD be addressed/fixed in/through 'FamilySearch'.

    Hopefully ...

    IF, the latter is the case; THEN, this post of yours, can/will used, as the catalyst, to have this matter (ie. ERROR, in a "Citation", in a "Source") be added to the ever increasing "List", of such things, that NEED, addressed/fixed in/through 'FamilySearch'

    Brett

    ps: These days, I do not even bother to 'look' as the "Citations" (although, like this one, over the years, I have seen a few that were a little 'wayward' - I used to "Report" them).

    .

    0
  • ChristopherTemple-Watts
    ChristopherTemple-Watts ✭
    August 6, 2021

    I think it's because the order of the list - the software must assume that the first name in the list is the HEAD of the household instead of looking to see which one has the name Head assigned.

    I looked at the 1861 CENSUS record for Mary Holford Kingscote on FindMyPast and it is fine there. Samuel J Smith is at the top of the list and is "Head" of the household.

    Quite strange!

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 29.9K All Categories
  • 24.1K FamilySearch Help
  • 122 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 442 FamilySearch Center
  • 460 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.4K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.6K Indexing
  • 634 Memories
  • 6.5K Temple
  • 321 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups