Ordinances unavailable
Answers
-
Please see private message
0 -
Hello Sister @MargaretAtkinson
Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
We have corrected the record for Thankful Vail LQ52-LC1 so now her completed ordinances display.
All the best,
0 -
Thank you!
0 -
FamilySearch
Data Administration
( Also ATTENTION: @Kerrebee )
I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...
[ And, I am a Member of the Church ... ]
Please advise if I am NOT able to 'see' ...
As, I DO NOT want to "Unmerge"/"Restore", the "Merged"/'Combined" individuals/persons ...
But ...
That Said ...
There could (ie. well, may) be a Problem/Issue with regard to "Temple" Work for Thankful VAIL ( LQ52-LC1 ).
I checked the "ChangeLog" for Thankful VAIL ( LQ52-LC1 ).
Accordingly, initially created with the "Gender" of "Male".
I checked the "Temple" Work for Thankful VAIL ( LQ52-LC1 ).
Currently:
▬ Ordinances of "B"; "C"; "I"; &. "E", were "Completed" between 12 and 13 of November in 1878 at the "Saint George Utah Temple". [ ie. Very OLD "Temple" Work ... ]
▬ Ordinance of "SP" was "Completed" on "2 March 1904" at the "Manti Utah Temple".
▬ Ordinance of "SS" was "Completed" on "9 December 1921" at the "Logan Utah Temple".
DOES that aforementioned "Temple" Work relate to the ACTUAL "Temple" Work for Thankful VAIL ( LQ52-LC1 ); BEFORE, (1) the 12 February 2019; and/or, (2) the 8 December 2020; as, a "Male"?
Because ..,
IF, such is the case; THEM, I would venture to suggest that such "Temple" Work done as a "Male", would (in fact) be INVALID; as, Thankful VAIL ( LQ52-LC1 ) is CURRENTLY, "Female".
The reason that I ask, is that, there were TWO (x2) "Merges"/"Combines" where Thankful VAIL ( LQ52-LC1 ) was "Merged"/"Combined":
(1) 12 February 2019
..... with Thankful VAIL ( LHNQ-ZS9 ) [ Original Name: Thankful TWIN Vail ]. ORIGINALLY as "Female".
------------------
This is where the 'Gender' of Thankful VAIL ( LQ52-LC1 ) appears to have been "Changed", from "Male", to "Female", during the Process of the "Merge"/"Combine".
------------------
(2) 8 December 2020
..... with Thankful VAIL ( MMT1-RC1 ). ORIGINALLY as "Female".
Hence, my confusion; and, concern, with regard to validity of the "Temple" Work.
Question: So WHOSE "Temple" Work appears on "Ordinance" page/screen of Thankful VAIL ( LQ52-LC1 )?
▬ Thankful VAIL ( LQ52-LC1 ), done apparently as a "Male"; OR,
▬ Thankful VAIL ( LHNQ-ZS9 ) [ Original Name: Thankful TWIN Vail ], done as a "Female"; OR,
▬ Thankful VAIL ( MMT1-RC1 ), done as a "Female".
And ...
IF, the "Temple" Work was ORIGINALLY done as a "Male"; and, relates to that 'Gender' of "Male"; THEN, has that been RECTIFIED; and, CANCELLED, in both, the "Temple" (System) Database; and, Physically (ie. Hard-Copy) "Temple" Records?
IF, the latter had NOT been RECTIFIED; and, CANCELLED; THEN, I would suggest that there is a definite Problem/Issue, than NEEDS immediate attention.
Whereas ...
IF, the "Temple" Work NOW relates to, either, Thankful VAIL ( LHNQ-ZS9 ); or, Thankful VAIL ( MMT1-RC1 ), where both, were done as "Female"; thereby was CORRECTED for "Gender"; THEN, there is no Problem/Issue.
Can you please investigate; and, advise.
The REASON that I am concerned, is predicated on the indication in "Family Tree" of 'FamilySearch', through "View My Relationship" (which I have just discovered), that I am somewhat related to Thankful VAIL ( LQ52-LC1 ), in my "Ancestral" Lines; as, she is "THE WIFE OF MY 10TH COUSIN FOUR TIMES REMOVED".
'Thank You' in advance.
Submitted for your, information; attention; and, consideration.
Kind Regards.
MAY THE LORD BLESS YOU IN THIS IMPORTANT WORK
Yours Faithfully,
Brett
0 -
Hello @Brett .
The ordinances currently showing for Thankful Vail LQ52-LC1 were performed for a female.
All the best.
0 -
G'Day, Compatriot (from over in the West)
'Thank You' so much, for that information.
That is good to know.
When one looks at the "ChangeLog", such is a little concerning, certainly NOT clear.
I have come across situations, where such was NOT the case; and, needed to be addressed/fixed.
After all, she is "Connected" to me too - although, distantly, through "Marriage".
Again, 'Thank You'.
Brett
ps: I certainly DID NOT want to do any "Unmerging"/"Restoring" ...
1