Marriage Records indexed as baptism records.

RSNeibaur

On FHL film #102061084 images #364-377 are marriage records. They have been indexed as baptism records. Is there a way to index them again as marriage records and add the missing spouses. Thank you for all these wonderful records.

Allison Lathrop

When a batch has been incorrectly indexed, please leave Feedback and return the batch so that it ca be reindexed correctly.

RSNeibaur

I was researching my ancestors and came upon their marriage record but then realized it was indexed as baptism records. I cannot return the batch as I was not indexing a batch. Where do I leave feedback? On the original record?

Mirevo

I think you got a record with errors of transcription.

We apologize for this inconvenience, you can still attach this record as a source for the person/s and explain the errors in the notes when and where you attach it.

I you do not see the Edit link you are probably viewing a record that is not correctable. When editing the error is not yet an option, we hope it will become an option in the future. 

Thank you for your patience.

CraigWArmstrong

@RSNeibaur

First of all you should be congratulated for even being able to read that old German Script. I assume you must be German with a name of Neibaur, but still I tried to decipher the records and had a very difficult time. I agree that the images 364 to 377 appear to be marriage records and not baptism records. However, once a batch is indexed, it would be very difficult to go back and re-index the batch. We are instructed to make what corrections we can. Please see the article from the help menu for further information.

https://www.familysearch.org/help/helpcenter/article/why-cant-i-fix-indexing-or-transcription-errors

RSNeibaur

Craig

Thank you for taking the time to look into my concern. I hope at some point they will be able to correct all aspects of a document. 😊