Missing Temple ordinance information
Answers
-
@WalkerJudithAnn1 - Thanks for providing the photo of the FGS. That is not an official FGS so the dates shown there are only secondary sources of work being done. The work was surely done. But with merges and breaking of relationships who knows where the effective (earliest) ordinance is today.
I did do some looking and I think I see a sealing dated 24 May 1937 in the record of Margaret Hyckes who was removed as John Pease's wife back in 2020. The trouble is if you look at her (ID L5F1-XWH) change log you will find at least two Margaret Pease records that are merged into this record. The early sealing of John and Margaret Pease is probably found in one of those records. Those records (these two Margaret Pease records merged into Margaret Hyckes) probably should be restored and studied to be sure they really aren't Margaret Hyckes and then, if appropriate merged into Margaret ID L5F2-J2V. This would at least start to resolve the problem.
If the ordinance you really want was messed up prior to records being moved into Tree (in otherwords here) it will take a data admin to resolve this. I am sure this case can be forwarded to them if what I described here isn't what you want or you are unable to follow how to do this. This is complex stuff and not for the faint of heart - but can be done with a little practice.
0