Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Get Involved/Indexing

city directories

BatemanLorraineSusanMarek
BatemanLorraineSusanMarek ✭
June 25, 2021 edited December 30, 2024 in Get Involved/Indexing

While indexing city directories, a page from a book of Who's who came up should this be indexed?

0

Answers

  • sgsreader
    sgsreader ✭✭✭
    June 27, 2021

    Please provide a batch number to review before answering your question. It's always helpful if we can see what you are seeing.

    1
  • Susan Ann Mullen
    Susan Ann Mullen ✭✭✭✭✭
    June 27, 2021

    The biography/histories should not be indexed. In the Project Instructions in What to Index it instructs us to mark histories as No, No Extractable Data.

    They sure are interesting though. Perhaps they will be indexed in another project in the future.

    1
  • Glenna GHB
    Glenna GHB ✭
    June 10, 2024

    do I index a spouse's name if it is not in parentheses?

    0
  • erutherford
    erutherford ✭✭✭✭✭
    June 10, 2024

    If the spouse does not have wid or widw or another variation of widow(er) next to it, it is index. Parentheses has no bearing on whether or not it is indexed.

    2
  • John David Durham
    John David Durham ✭
    June 10, 2024

    Please note that many of the Part E City Directories, you'll find all sorts of variations as to how the spouse is listed

    Many indexers are missing indexing the spouse as they are used to seeing the spouse only listed in ( ). As stated in erutherford's post, "Parentheses have no bearing on whether or not it is indexed."

    Example of how the following should be indexed:

    Pate Hardin. bartender, res 309 2nd Ave, Mrs Gertrude

    Correctly indexed as:

    Surname: Pate

    Given Name: Hardin

    Spouse Surname: Pate

    Spouses Given Name: Gertrude

    Spouses Prefix: Mrs (only because it was listed with the Mrs in the directory)

    0
  • VBScott
    VBScott ✭
    June 11, 2024

    I'm reviewing City Directories. At the start of the name change it states, "Coleman, see also Colman." The directory then lists the Coleman families. The indexer typed, "Coleman or Colman." for the surname for all of the listed families. Should all of the names on the list be classified as "Coleman or Colman" or should they be listed as the spelling on the individual's line?

    1
  • erutherford
    erutherford ✭✭✭✭✭
    June 11, 2024

    The only name that is indexed is Coleman. Any surname that has "see also" attached to it is not indexed. "see also" alerts the viewer that the person they are looking for may be under another spelling of the name.

    3
  • VBScott
    VBScott ✭
    June 11, 2024

    Excellent, Thank you so much. 😀

    0
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 42.7K Ask a Question
  • 3.3K General Questions
  • 568 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.7K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 640 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.1K Search
  • 995 Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 473 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups