Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Suggest an Idea

FH Emails for FH Callings

Leslie Edmunds
Leslie Edmunds ✭
February 12, 2021 edited October 15, 2021 in Suggest an Idea

It is my understanding that the SLC emails for FH Callings are sent based on the standardized callings entered into the Stake and Ward Directories. The Stake people with FH callings don't seem to be getting the emails.


Any ideas?

0
0
Up Down
0 votes

New · Last Updated October 15, 2021

Comments

  • Amy Archibald
    Amy Archibald mod
    February 13, 2021

    They need to make sure their calling was entered into the software correctly - by selecting the default calling. If the default calling isn't selected, and a calling is "created" in the software, then they won't get the emails.

    0
  • Amy Archibald
    Amy Archibald mod
    February 13, 2021

    They need to make sure their calling was entered into the software correctly - by selecting the default calling. If the default calling isn't selected, and a calling is "created" in the software, then they won't get the emails.

    0
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 13, 2021

    Leslie

    .

    FYI

    .

    Just a thought ...

    .

    I relation to those, in "Stake" 'Callings', that are NOT actually the "Standard" (or, "Generic') "Stake" 'Callings' ...

    .

    The SIMPLE solution, is to GIVE, those in a "Stake", that have been given (ie. "Called" as) a "User-Defined" [ for particular "Stake" ] 'Calling', the ADDITION of the "Standard" (or, "Generic') "Stake" 'Callings', in LCR, against their "Membership Record".

    .

    That way ... 'you have the BEST of BOTH Worlds' ...

    .

    They have their "User-Defined" [ for particular "Stake" ] 'Calling' ,,,

    And, they have the "Standard" (or, "Generic') "Stake" 'Callings' ...

    .

    So, with the latter, they RECEIVE, the access to RESOURCES; and, the "Messages", that they NEED to magnify their "Calling" ...

    .

    The Church, CANNOT "Cover", ALL of the many and various "User-Defined" [ for particular "Stake" ] 'Callings', by the MANY Stakes/Districts around the World.

    .

    Doing such, is NOT 'breaking any Rules' ...

    Doing such, is simply working in/with LCR to make the "System" MORE effective ...

    [ ie. 'thinking and working outside of the box' ... ]

    .

    Again, just my thought.

    .

    Brett

    .

    ps: Such has been done in, both, Stakes/Districts; and, Wards/Branches ... it actually Works.

    .

    0
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 13, 2021

    Leslie

    .

    FYI

    .

    Just a thought ...

    .

    I relation to those, in "Stake" 'Callings', that are NOT actually the "Standard" (or, "Generic') "Stake" 'Callings' ...

    .

    The SIMPLE solution, is to GIVE, those in a "Stake", that have been given (ie. "Called" as) a "User-Defined" [ for particular "Stake" ] 'Calling', the ADDITION of the "Standard" (or, "Generic') "Stake" 'Callings', in LCR, against their "Membership Record".

    .

    That way ... 'you have the BEST of BOTH Worlds' ...

    .

    They have their "User-Defined" [ for particular "Stake" ] 'Calling' ,,,

    And, they have the "Standard" (or, "Generic') "Stake" 'Callings' ...

    .

    So, with the latter, they RECEIVE, the access to RESOURCES; and, the "Messages", that they NEED to magnify their "Calling" ...

    .

    The Church, CANNOT "Cover", ALL of the many and various "User-Defined" [ for particular "Stake" ] 'Callings', by the MANY Stakes/Districts around the World.

    .

    Doing such, is NOT 'breaking any Rules' ...

    Doing such, is simply working in/with LCR to make the "System" MORE effective ...

    [ ie. 'thinking and working outside of the box' ... ]

    .

    Again, just my thought.

    .

    Brett

    .

    ps: Such has been done in, both, Stakes/Districts; and, Wards/Branches ... it actually Works.

    .

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 28.6K All Categories
  • 22.9K FamilySearch Help
  • 114 Get Involved
  • 2.6K General Questions
  • 425 FamilySearch Center
  • 433 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.2K Family Tree
  • 3.2K Search
  • 4.5K Indexing
  • 592 Memories
  • 6.2K Temple
  • 310 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.4K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups