Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Suggest an Idea

Replace any person record's fields with source data when linking source to record

LegacyUser
LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
April 11, 2020 edited September 28, 2020 in Suggest an Idea
Joshua Lyman said: When linking a source to a record, if the record has better information for some field (for example, death date), it would be great to be able to replace the existing info at that same time instead of needing to link, return to the person's record, and manually change the data with a note of where it came from.
Tagged:
  • New
  • Other
0

Comments

  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    July 10, 2016
    Tom Huber said: I have seen this sort of request before, especially tied to death records. Unless the source is an actual death certificate, any other source may contain inaccuracies.

    What I would like to see is the option to change field information on the person's details page when using the source linker. That would allow the person linking the source to evaluate the information. I'm not in favor of automatically updating the record.
    0
  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    July 11, 2016
    Joshua Lyman said: Good call Tom. To clarify, I was working with death certificates with associated images. Also, I wouldn't be in favor of automatically updating either, but I like the user interaction where a box is on the right and there is the "Replace" link that copies over the new data on top. That way it is user directed, but easier to do than doing so manually.
    0
  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    July 11, 2016
    Tom Huber said: I don't have a problem with that. Ancestry.com does something simlar. If you like the new information, you can check the box, or if you have a conclusion that is different than either the new document and the information in the person's record, you can update the record manually.

    Checkbox to apply the new conclusion.
    Field to manually change the conclusion (with a seaparate reason statement required).
    0
  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    July 11, 2016
    Joshua Lyman said: That'd work. Would save a few extra steps, and yes to requiring a separate reason statement.
    0
  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    April 11, 2020
    Wayne Collens said: YES!!
    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 28.6K All Categories
  • 22.9K FamilySearch Help
  • 114 Get Involved
  • 2.6K General Questions
  • 425 FamilySearch Center
  • 433 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.2K Family Tree
  • 3.2K Search
  • 4.5K Indexing
  • 592 Memories
  • 6.2K Temple
  • 310 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.4K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups