No way to filter parent-child relationship if they don't have a specific relationship.

LegacyUser

Jordi Kloosterboer said: We need a general and or non-specific parent-child relationship filter.

LegacyUser

Jordi Kloosterboer said: It would also be nice to separate between the current person as the child in the relationship or the parent in the relationship.

LegacyUser

Jeff Wiseman said: A child will ALWAYS have a specific parent-child relationship with a parent in the family. The only other relationship type I can think of might be Unknown--but there would be a bunch of complications adding that one.

What is a specific situation where you would need something other than the 5 parent types that are now provided?

LegacyUser

Adrian Bruce said: Well I never add a specific parent-child relationship unless it's not biological - so what ends up on file for my entries? It shouldn't default to biological behind the scenes (if it did it visibly, that'd be fine).

LegacyUser

Jordi Kloosterboer said: Yep so Adrian would not be able to filter parent- child relationships since he didn't add a specific relationship type.

LegacyUser

Jordi Kloosterboer said: Well someone messed up several profiles changing names birth dates death dates and relationships. Which is bad for ordinances. So I had to revert things back and get the sources sorted out. I had to find the original parents but in order to do that I had to look for where the main person is the child... I should be able to quickly filter instead of looking at the millions of parent child relationships.. (exaggerated ofc). And all of that was muddled in with other details because all the parent child relationships had no specific relationship type. Also you may want to look at all parent child relationships by themselves, but currently you can only filter by a specific relationship type. So, that is why I ask for both a general/all parent child relationship and a for a non specific relationship type (when you don't out a relationship type)