Move topic tags down a few lines, on photos. etc

LegacyUser

Roger Moritz said: On Gallery items, can you please move the topic tags below the description.
They don't belong at the top in my opinion. Distracting,
Thanks

LegacyUser

Tom Huber said: This issue has been raised before and I believe it was acknowledged, but a quick check shows it still no longer to be a problem (Chrome on Windows 10).

Roger, it would help if you provide a screen shot of what you are talking about, where you are looking at the memories (from the person's page or your Memories page and what options you've selected.

Screen shots can be added to replies by clicking on the Add Image at the bottom right corner of the reply.

LegacyUser

Roger Moritz said: It's a new feature on any gallery item page. Just look at a gallery item. upper right

LegacyUser

gasmodels said: So as I understand your comment is that in the right hand column when looking at a memory you do not like the list of tagged people at the very top of the list but would rather it was move below the description. My recollection is that it was always at or near the top and since it is probably the most used feature ie more tagging is done than writing descriptions, -- consequently it appears at the top of the list. I certainly have no problem with it being there. If this is not the issue of concern, then I agree with Tom you need to post and image or be more specific in describing the issue of concern.

LegacyUser

Jessie Hearle said: Topic tags are a new memories feature

LegacyUser

Jessie Hearle said: Any user can add up to 30 topic tags

https://familysearch.org/ask/productS...

LegacyUser

Roger Moritz said: Thanks Jessie,
Yes the topic tags just adds unsymmetrical space to the top of the info. I think it distracts the page a bit. I don't think it's important enough to be on the first line, just my preference.

LegacyUser

Roger Moritz said: No, of course the people should stay at the top, Jessie covered it below

LegacyUser

Tom Huber said: I missed the "topic tags" and thought this had to do with the person's memory page where the memory type (section title) was partially overwritten by the memory in the preceding section.