Home› Ask a Question› Search

YEAH!! Full Text Search returned results with BOTH public and restricted results

SusanKB
SusanKB ✭
June 8 in Search

On May 31, 2026, I got wonderful results. See uploaded screen shot. Thank you for this improvement. But wait.. Today I did the same search using a different name, and it didn't work, no restricted records showed up in my list. Tried other variations of names and I do not get that wonderful lock icon showing in my results.

 I was so pleased that you made it possible to quickly find those locked files rather than having to go back to the catalog to find what reels contained locked records. Today only thumbnail images next to the file names, no locks for easier identification of more restrictive access.
PLEASE restore the Lock Icons on the full text search accessible records that require the more restricted access.Everyone's research process would be more efficient if we can organize our trips to the FamilySearch Centers. Susan Bleimehl.

a m maxwell FS full text search.png
a m maxwell FS full text search.png 318.1K
1

Best Answers

  • SerraNola
    SerraNola ✭✭✭✭✭
    June 8 Answer ✓

    Thank you for your feedback! I have forwarded it to the engineering team.

    0
  • Mark McKenzie_1
    Mark McKenzie_1 ✭✭✭
    June 9 Answer ✓

    I believe there is 'work in progress' to modify how locked records are displayed and the associated interface. Should be back before too long…

    0

Answers

  • SusanKB
    SusanKB ✭
    June 11

    Thank you. I was so happy to have discovered that both—the restricted and open— show up in a single search. It's such a time saver. I sure hope that this will happen. And Thank You to the engineers who add improvements to how we can be more efficient in our processes.

    1
  • Gail Swihart Watson
    Gail Swihart Watson ✭✭✭✭✭
    June 16 edited June 16

    Everyone should be happy that locked records were visible in full text search results, but no, there were complaints and now it's gone. My discussion of this has been moved or removed; can't find it. Apparently the capability won't be back soon. An on off toggle has to be coded and how much of a priority that is isn't clear.

    Edit: Actually, I found my discussion (it had been moved, https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/629569) and as of June 5, it was predicted the coding for an on off toggle would be available "in a few weeks." Yay!

    0
  • Áine.ní.Donnghaile
    Áine.ní.Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    June 18
    image.png
    image.png 151.9K
    2
  • Gail Swihart Watson
    Gail Swihart Watson ✭✭✭✭✭
    June 18

    Yes, this is brilliant!

    0
  • SusanKB
    SusanKB ✭
    June 23

    This is a great solution. THANK YOU!!!!!

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 47K Ask a Question
  • 7.5K Family Tree
  • 6.1K Search
  • 5.4K General Questions
  • 7K Get Involved
  • 1.2K Memories
  • 338 Other Languages
  • 80 Community News
  • Groups