Home› Ask a Question› Search

1950 Census pages not indexed.

JHornberger4
JHornberger4 ✭
March 28 in Search

I have come across multiple instances where complete pages of the 1950 Census have not been indexed and because of that they cannot be edited to add names. Is there any way familysearch can allow for editing or reporting the pages so they can be indexed? I hate knowing people can't find their relatives because of a computer error.

Example: https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QHK-SQHW-Q46N?view=index&cc=4464515&lang=en&groupId=

Tagged:
  • Indexing
  • #FamilySearch
  • Correcting indexing errors
  • 1950 US census
0

Answers

  • MandyShaw1
    MandyShaw1 ✭✭✭✭✭
    March 28

    @SerraNola are 1950 Census gaps like these on your remediation list please?

    2
  • SerraNola
    SerraNola ✭✭✭✭✭
    March 31

    @JHornberger4 @MandyShaw1 Yes, missing indexing in the 1950 Census has been an on-going problem and not usually connected with user-editing. It is definitely on the list!

    3
  • maryellenstevensbarnes1
    maryellenstevensbarnes1 ✭✭✭✭✭
    March 31

    Meanwhile, the 1950 US Census can be found at https://1950census.archives.gov/

    0
  • Eugene Breindel
    Eugene Breindel ✭
    June 17 edited June 17

    I too have discovered a problem with indexed information on the 1950Census

    Citation:

    "United States, Census, 1950", FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:6F7J-1MLL : Tue Mar 18 06:36:09 UTC 2025), Entry for Charlie Holloway and Hullit Holloway, April 10, 1950.

    The actual Location is this:

    Event Place (Original)

    Beat 21, Callnan, Alabama

    Enumeration District

    22-46

    Line Number

    1

    Page Number

    10



    The problem is this erroneous information above it:

    Event Place

    Alabama Township, Nevada, Arkansas, United States

    Alabama, Genesee, New York, United StatesAlabama, Polk, Wisconsin, United StatesAlabama, Elko, Nevada, United States

    Was this an edit of some typo?
    Thanks for the help.

    0
  • Áine.ní.Donnghaile
    Áine.ní.Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    June 17

    @Eugene Breindel That is a place standardization issue. You'll find many threads on the subject over the last couple of years. It's an issue that crept in during the migration of records from one system to another. There's a good description in this comment from SerraNola:
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/623709/#Comment_623709

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 47K Ask a Question
  • 7.5K Family Tree
  • 6.1K Search
  • 5.4K General Questions
  • 7K Get Involved
  • 1.2K Memories
  • 338 Other Languages
  • 80 Community News
  • Groups