Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Search

BUG REPORT - Location Research Landing Pages

Áine Ní Donnghaile
Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
September 21, 2024 edited February 5 in Search

As of yesterday, 20 Sep 2024, the Location Research Landing Pages no longer accept keyboard or copy/paste name input making it impossible to search by Location. I've tested on 2 computers and 4 different browsers. I've also verified with a colleague that he sees the same non-functioning behavior.

For example, the New York State research page: https://www.familysearch.org/search/location/22?region=New%20York

or the Ireland research page:
https://www.familysearch.org/search/location/1927084?region=Ireland

Try entering First Names or Last Names.

I've reported via Feedback, but I've never been sure if that report goes anywhere useful.

@Sam Sulser @Stephanie V. @Ashlee C. Could someone please escalate these issues?

Thank you.

Tagged:
  • search records
2

Answers

  • SerraNola
    SerraNola mod
    September 22, 2024

    @Áine Ní Donnghaile Thank you for reporting this important breakdown in our Search by Place resources. It will be brought to the attention of the appropriate engineering team.

    1
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 23, 2024

    Thanks @SerraNola

    Is there ANY hope of posting an announcement about the problem?

    0
  • Stephanie V.
    Stephanie V. admin
    September 23, 2024

    An announcement was made in Community News. Thanks for bringing this to our attention!

    0
  • Stephanie V.
    Stephanie V. admin
    September 23, 2024

    This is now fixed 😊

    0
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 23, 2024 edited September 24, 2024

    Thanks - you've been traveling in the TARDIS, I think.

    image.png
    2
  • MandyShaw1
    MandyShaw1 ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 24, 2024 edited September 24, 2024

    @Stephanie V. is there any news on the 'outstanding issues and their progress' page that I was told months ago was under consideration for development? Good for this sort of thing, but really important for long-lasting and impactful data problems such as those caused by index editor glitches and by placename standardisation.

    1
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 42.7K Ask a Question
  • 3.3K General Questions
  • 570 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.7K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 640 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 998 Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 473 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups