US, Illinois—Naturalization Records, 1856–1951 [Part C] [MQK7-97M]

Lisa Kay Horlacher

This was partially indexed.

On image 1 the OOA was crossed out because the PET was dismissed and the primary was not yet 2 yrs old. Should I index it? If so what is the name on it and should I use sept. 13, 1910?

On image 2, I think this should be indexed because

• When information was crossed out, was not replaced, and can be read, type the crossed-out information.

Thanks

https://www.familysearch.org/indexing/batch/19a87104-10aa-4b4a-9b8b-0a468c72c5fd

erutherford

You will index both. Image 1 Is Leyo Kupcsik and Image 2 is John Puska. The dates at the top of the OOA are not used as the record date. The record date that is used is the one that accompanies either admitting or denying the petitioner.