US—Mortality Schedules, 1850–1880 [Part B] [MQF5-TL5]

JaniceAllen57

The last two batches I have pulled up were regular Census records. Should these be included in indexing mortality schedules?

Patricia Capps

I agree. I've only found 2 mortality schedules.

maryellenstevensbarnes1

@JaniceAllen57 Batch [MQF5-TL5] is an accounting page for industry - I believe it should be returned, marked NNED and I have tagged @Maile L @Maile L to alert FS tech support to the problem https://www.familysearch.org/indexing/batch/79df6ced-e792-48e2-b846-1b34fe298eaa. Thanks for sending the batch number😎

maryellenstevensbarnes1

@Patricia Capps - if your batch looks like the batch code above, return it NNED. If its something else, please give the batch code so someone can see what you see and hold your batch for a response😎

JaniceAllen57

Thanks, Mary Ellen. I will send a note with the batch codes of any of the other non-mortality records. Thanks for responding

Maile L

Marking them NNED is all that is needed. The Project Instructions state:

• Index all mortality schedules.
• Mark all other images, including corporation or agriculture schedules, social statistics, military records, population (non-death) schedules, or permanent records of birth or death, in Step 1: Images as No, No Extractable Data.