Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Family Tree

Family member with no source attached?

HarveyNaeser
HarveyNaeser ✭
January 27, 2024 edited September 26, 2024 in Family Tree

When fallowing my family tree and I come to a family member with "no source attached". is it safe to assume that family member is accurate plus family members past that point?

Thanks

0

Answers

  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 27, 2024

    We should never assume in genealogy. Even when there are many sources attached, we should verify that the sources are accurate and not just records for someone with the same or similar name.

    3
  • MandyShaw1
    MandyShaw1 ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 27, 2024

    I would say no, indeed in my verification efforts I have been looking for at least one source (whether a FS Record or not) that showed that person in the correct family context, e.g. birth registration showing correct maiden name for mother, burial of immediate family members in same cemetery, census record that looks reasonable for that family at that time, etc.

    1
  • HarveyNaeser
    HarveyNaeser ✭
    January 27, 2024

    Thank you very much! I kind of felt that way. If I couldn't find some connection I stopped at that point. I have worked years on doing my and my wife's genealogy. I find it fascinating. I have been able to disprove and prove family stories. I also fascinating with seeing family hand writing on forms. It brings a closer personal connection to them.

    ~ Harv

    1
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 43K Ask a Question
  • 3.4K General Questions
  • 571 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.8K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 644 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 1K Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 476 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups