Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Get Involved/Indexing

US Connecticut Nat Records. Image 2 is not a "true" duplicate because it has the words

Lisa Kay Horlacher
Lisa Kay Horlacher ✭✭✭
January 1, 2024 edited September 30, 2024 in Get Involved/Indexing

"DOCUMENT INTENTIONALLY REPEATED" added. Should I mark it as a duplicate image or NNED? It seems that the results would be the same regardless.

https://www.familysearch.org/indexing/batch/3df85a57-e55f-4b28-92a9-5e1ae50f07c9

0

Answers

  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 1, 2024

    Those words aren't part of the document. They're a microfilming artifact and should be disregarded for purposes of assessing the image.

    It's a duplicate image.

    1
  • barbaragailsmith1
    barbaragailsmith1 ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 1, 2024

    Duplicate Image really means Duplicate Image of the Document. Which this is. That little sign isn't on the document.

    0
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 43K Ask a Question
  • 3.4K General Questions
  • 571 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.8K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 645 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 1K Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 478 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups