Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› General Questions

Why were the WWII draft registration cards for 1877-1897-born men destroyed for the Southern US?

DanielGonik
DanielGonik ✭
November 12, 2023 edited November 12, 2024 in General Questions

Why were the WWII draft registration cards for 1877-1897-born men destroyed for a lot of mostly Southern US states? Here is what I'm talking about here: https://www.ancestry.com/search/collections/1002/

"The original draft registration cards for the following states were destroyed several years ago and were never microfilmed before they were destroyed. Therefore, there will never be records for these states in this database.

  • Alabama
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Maine
  • Mississippi
  • New Mexico
  • North Carolina
  • South Carolina
  • Tennessee"

Why exactly were the relevant WWII draft registration cards for these US states destroyed? Does anyone here know the answer to this question of mine?

0

Answers

  • Melissa S Himes
    Melissa S Himes ✭✭✭✭✭
    November 13, 2023

    They may have been destroyed in the 1973 fire at National Personnel Records Center in St Louis. 16-18 million records were lost that had not been microfilmed and there were no duplicate copies.

    2
  • AnneLoForteWillson
    AnneLoForteWillson mod
    December 19, 2023

    Actually, there is a little more detail on these particular draft registration cards at the National Archives' HistoryHub site:

    The 4th Registration draft (Old Man’s Draft) cards were scheduled for destruction prior to the 1973 Fire. The following states had already destroyed their collection of this date range before the National Archives took custody of the records:


    North Carolina               Mississippi                    Maine

    Alabama                         Florida

    Georgia                          South Carolina

    Tennessee                       New Mexico

    3
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    December 19, 2023

    They were destroyed once it was determined the information was not needed.

    1
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 2, 2024
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/537109#Comment_537109

    So, it was ironically the 1973 fire that saved the Old Man's Draft cards for the other US states?

    0
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 2, 2024
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/537137#Comment_537137

    Well, it could have been helpful as an aid in verifying the ages of extremely old men (age 107+ and especially age 110+), but the people in charge of this probably didn't realize that.

    0
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 2, 2024

    Records were not created for the purpose of genealogical research.

    2
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 6, 2024
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/542101#Comment_542101

    Yes, I'm well-aware of that. I'm just saying that this is an unintended useful side effect of these records' existence. Ditto for the existence of historical US Census entries (the entries themselves, for various people).

    0
  • AnneLoForteWillson
    AnneLoForteWillson mod
    February 6, 2024
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/542098#Comment_542098

    I suppose you could say that. But there are always limitations on how many records an archive can keep, according to the size of its storage, its ability to keep the records safe and the usefulness of the records. As mentioned above, if the records' data is determined to no longer be of value, the records are likely to be destroyed.

    2
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 7, 2024
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/542644#Comment_542644

    To be fair, the records can be saved on microfilm before they are destroyed. That would save up some space while also allowing the contents of these records to be preserved for posterity. I think that something like this was done for old US Census entries (as in, the actual US Census entries themselves, with people's names, ages, birth places, et cetera).

    0
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 7, 2024

    Time machine , anyone?

    1
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 7, 2024 edited February 7, 2024
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/542732#Comment_542732

    Good idea! We can save the 1890 US Census entries as well while we're at it lol!

    0
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 7, 2024

    Interestingly enough, this is what in fact was actually done with some past US Census entries in real life: https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2022/02/17/census-records-come-to-the-national-archives/#:~:text=The%201900%E2%80%931970%20censuses%20exist,the%20records%20easier%20to%20transport.

    "The 1900–1970 censuses exist only on microfilm—after the Census Bureau made microfilm copies, they often destroyed the originals. Because of the massive volume of material, microfilm was seen as a way of preserving information while at the same time saving storage space, and making the records easier to transport."

    0
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 7, 2024 edited February 7, 2024
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/542732#Comment_542732

    Well, I just invoked that because AFAIK, that's what actually happened to old US Census entries, such as the 1900 US Census entries. What we now see on FS.org are not the actual entries, but microfilm versions of them, with the original (paper) entries being destroyed decades ago based on what I have read.

    A time machine would be great! Then we could save the 1890 US Census.

    0
  • AnneLoForteWillson
    AnneLoForteWillson mod
    February 7, 2024

    @DanielGonik Absolutely! One would hope that those records that are no longer kept have been microfilmed (or digitized in these modern times). The censuses are a good example of that. Speaking of the 1890 census...while it did get burned, the remaining remnants were actually put on the destruction list and destroyed rather than microfilming prior to doing so. Huge contrast with the 1973 fire where they did everything possible (and still are) to retrieve the original records and rebuild the lost information.

    1
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 7, 2024

    While we all lament that most of the remnants of the 1890 census were destroyed, it is understandable. Much of what remained was watersoaked. The techniques available for restoration or conservation in 1921, when the 1890 was burned, compared to those available in 1973, when the St Louis fire occurred, were very different.

    0
  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 7, 2024

    "The techniques available for restoration or conservation in 1921, when the 1890 was burned, compared to those available in 1973, when the St Louis fire occurred, were very different."

    And both are a world away from what people are working on now: they've read part of a 2000-year-old carbonized papyrus scroll from Herculaneum (https://scrollprize.org/grandprize). Without actually touching it. And they're confident that they'll be able to read the rest, eventually.

    2
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 8, 2024
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/542820#Comment_542820

    Worth noting that there is an 1891 book published with the 1890 US Census results for Northampton County, Pennsylvania: https://www.masthof.com/products/northampton-county-pa-everything-collection

    "1890 Census Directory of Northampton County (Eleventh U.S. Census) Also Directory of Phillipsburg, N.J. (Joseph H. Werner, 1891, 644 pages)"

    There is a free version of its contents available online here: https://www.bethlehempaonline.com/beth1890/communities.html

    It's just one US county, but there was a future verified 119-year-old living in the county as a child back then, specifically 10-year-old (well, actually 9-year-old, but her age was rounded upwards) Sarah D. Clark, later known as Sarah Knauss after her marriage: https://www.bethlehempaonline.com/beth1890/abc.html

    Here's her family specifically: "Clark Walter 41, carpenter--Amelia 33, Charles H 12, Sarah D 10, Foster E 1. 524 Broad"

    She died on December 30, 1999 at age 119: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Knauss

    Quite a miracle that at least the 1890 US Census results for that single Pennsylvania county were preserved in book form.

    0
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 8, 2024

    BTW, this might seem like a stupid alternate history question, but I'll ask it here anyway: Do you think that the 1890 US Census returns would have still eventually been destroyed in a fire sooner or later had World War I not broken out back in 1914? I'm primarily applying the logic of the butterfly effect here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

    0
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 8, 2024
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/542825#Comment_542825

    Yep, I saw and read about that!

    0
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 8, 2024

    @Julia Szent-Györgyi and the work being carried out by archivists in Ireland, with the remnants saved from the Four Courts in 1922, are beyond amazing. Packed away for nearly 100 years and coming back to life.

    1
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 12, 2024
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/542896#Comment_542896

    Very sad about how a lot of Irish historical records were destroyed in that fire: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Courts

    "On 14 April 1922, the courts complex was occupied by IRA forces opposed to the Anglo-Irish Treaty, with Rory O'Connor acting as their spokesman. On 28 June the new National Army attacked the building to dislodge the "rebels", on the orders of the Minister for Defence Richard Mulcahy, authorised by President of Dáil Éireann Arthur Griffith.[14] This attack provoked a week of fighting in Dublin. In the process of the bombardment, the historic building was destroyed. The west wing of the building was obliterated in a huge explosion, destroying the Irish Public Record Office at the rear of the building. Nearly a thousand years of archives were destroyed by this explosion, the ensuing fire, and the water poured onto the fire.[15]"

    AFAIK, a lot of Irish historical census records were also lost in that 1922 fire.

    Let's hope that the revival project currently going on will be successful: https://www.irishcentral.com/roots/history/seven-centuries-irish-public-records

    0
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    February 24, 2024

    Apparently now familysearch.org has the WWII draft cards publicly available, or at least most of them, at least for those men who were born in the early 20th century. This is excellent news!

    Great job in regards to this, and thank you very much!

    1
  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 24, 2024

    The fourth draft appears to be in two nationwide collections now:

    Browsable images only, although the text talks about a "name index"; men age 45-64: https://www.familysearch.org/search/collection/1339071

    Search and browsable images, again for men age 45-64: https://www.familysearch.org/search/collection/1861144

    In addition, typing "II Draft" into the Find A Collection box on the Search - Records landing page lists 39 states plus the Virgin Islands that have WWII draft card collections. Some of them don't have browsable images, but the records do have images attached (e.g. California: https://www.familysearch.org/search/collection/2786603), while others have both index and browsable images (e.g. Pennsylvania: https://www.familysearch.org/search/collection/2603579). All of the ones I looked at specified that these state-specific collections do not include the fourth draft.

    1
  • DanielGonik
    DanielGonik ✭
    March 12, 2024
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/544962#Comment_544962

    Do you know if there are any draft registration cards available for US men for the Korean War and/or Vietnam War, either online or somewhere offline but with the potential of them being downloaded online in the future?

    0
  • Melissa S Himes
    Melissa S Himes ✭✭✭✭✭
    March 12, 2024

    This might help answer your question, @DanielGonik

    https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/United_States_Korean_War_1950_to_1953


    1
  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    March 12, 2024

    I only know what the Internet tells me about U.S. records of any sort, military or otherwise. Sorry.

    0
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 42.7K Ask a Question
  • 3.3K General Questions
  • 570 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.7K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 640 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 997 Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 473 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups