Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Get Involved/Indexing

US, Michigan—Naturalization Records, 1818–1977 [MQCN-N4F]

KillpackShaunaJean1
KillpackShaunaJean1 ✭
July 6, 2023 edited July 13, 2023 in Get Involved/Indexing

Does this batch qualify under the rule: "Do not index correspondence or other legal documents?' Should I indicate, "No, No Extractable Data"? They are very difficult to make a judgement.

0

Answers

  • Melissa S Himes
    Melissa S Himes ✭✭✭✭✭
    July 6, 2023

    I think you are correct to mark them No since they are legal correspondence and don't have anything to do with naturalizations.

    0
  • erutherford
    erutherford ✭✭✭✭✭
    July 6, 2023

    These are court cases and do fall under the legal documents rule. You will mark the entire batch as NNED.

    0
  • KillpackShaunaJean1
    KillpackShaunaJean1 ✭
    July 6, 2023

    Thank you so much. Your answers were a big help to me. I'm glad I asked.

    0
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 43K Ask a Question
  • 3.4K General Questions
  • 571 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.8K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 645 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 1K Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 478 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups