Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Search

Fix the Event Place for England, Middlesex Parish Registers

DeborahCarl
DeborahCarl ✭✭✭
June 4, 2023 edited July 26, 2024 in Search

I'm looking for information in Colonial Norwalk, Fairfield, Connecticut and the Middlesex Parish Registers come up in the search because the Event Place is labeled Stepney, Monroe, Fairfield, Connecticut Colony, British Colonial America.

It was very confusing because Stepney, Monroe, Fairfield, Connecticut Colony, British Colonial America is a legitimate location https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepney,_Connecticut and I wondered if the records were kept in England which is why they were coming up in my search. But Stepney Parish was also in London, England, and at the beginning of the book the location is Saint Dunstan and All Saints Church, Stepney, Middlesex, England. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepney_(parish)

Screenshot 2023-06-03 at 19-54-44 England Middlesex Parish Registers 1539-1988 https __familysearch.org_ark _61903_3 1 3Q9M-CSF7-QK2K cc 3734475.png
Screenshot 2023-06-03 at 19-54-16 England Middlesex Parish Registers 1539-1988 https __familysearch.org_ark _61903_3 1 3QS7-996G-GZ cc 3734475.png


Tagged:
  • Active
1

Answers

  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    June 4, 2023

    That's the auto-standardization bot, hard at work confusing the world by picking places effectively at random.

    You can recognize its work by looking at an index detail page, such as https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:6ZBL-W7TS. Notice how it has two event place fields? The one labeled with a parenthetical "Original" is what was actually indexed: "Stepney". The other one is what the automated process picked out of the global places database to go with that text. Unfortunately, there appears to have been no attempt made at validating the data generated by the bot: nobody checked that the parish register is from England, so the event places in Connecticut are completely guaranteed to be the wrong choice.

    FS believes it can fix these errors piecemeal, based on user reports like yours here in the Community. (Given that it's not an exaggeration that there are millions of such errors in the indexed records database, I hope I can be forgiven my continued scepticism about this belief.)

    2
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    June 4, 2023

    @N Tychonievich

    1
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 42.7K Ask a Question
  • 3.3K General Questions
  • 570 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.7K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 640 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 998 Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 473 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups