Beginning Monday, April 10th the temple category will only be viewable to Church members who must be logged into their member account to see it.
If you have questions about your account, please post in the FamilySearch Account category or contact us via another channel here: https://www.familysearch.org/en/fieldops/familysearch-support-contact-us.
Sealing to parent ordinaces Emily Hatwell LKC8-CSV
Emily Hatwell, who is my 3rd cousin 3X removed, born 17 June 1876, christened 19 November 1883 has her sealing to parents ordinance as completed with no parents listed and another as ready with parents listed. The ready cannot be reserved. Based on latest change history there is no change to the parent-child relationship and no duplicates could be located.
Since the rest of her siblings are going to be sealed soon to her parents, I want to be sure that her sealing to parents is valid which is based on her christening record.
If so can the green ready be removed?
Emily Hatwell LKC8-CSV: The sealing to parents ordinance now appears correctly in Family Tree.0
Thanks for your efforts. but there is one more issue. Emily Hatwell's LKC8-CSV mother is Ann Elizabeth Bromley G7PJ-BJK. Ann Eilzabeth Bromley had a sister Elizabeth Bromley G7PV-7WX. Based on the collaboration comments under Ann Elizabeth Bromley ( which I forgot I wrote in 2020) discussed how Ann Elizabeth and Elizabeth Bromley were sisters and not the same person.
Elizabeth Bromley G7PV-7WX was the spouse of James Hatwell MFWK-P1K in Family Search earlier. Under that relationship some of the children including Emily was sealed to her parents. If I remember correctly I on this type of sealing the sealing ordiance is still valid if the father is correct because the wording of mother takes precedence over the mother's name. So the adjustments you just made to Family Search was correct for the applicable children.
Corrections were made in the past to create and put Ann Elizabeth Bromley G7PJ-BJK as the mother and additional children that were missing were added. Elizabeth Bromley G7PV-7WX ,who exsisted in Family Search, actually married Thomas Frost MMBR-LXG. That relationship was set up.
The issue now is the individual temple ordinances for Ann Elizabeth Bromley is actuality's her sister Elizabeth Bromley's G7PV-7WX individual ordinances. Ann Elizabeth's temple ordinances are now missing.
Ann Elizabeth Bromley G7PJ-BJK ordinances are: Baptisim 26 August 2022 at MTIMP; Confirmation 26 August 2022 at MTIMP; other ordinances have been reserved but not completed. James Hatwell was sealed 30 April 2016 in SGEOR to his spouse when the wife was Elizabeth in FS. The parish register document that was used to get the marriage date of 14 May 1855 was that of his actual wife Ann Elizabeth Bromley. So I am not sure how that works. It that valid?
Elizabeth Bromley's G7PV-7WX individual ordinances are: Baptism 1 July 2008 REXBU; Confirmation 1 July 2008 REXBU; Intiatiory 27 Nov 2015 SGEOR; Endowment 8 Mar 2016 SGEOR; Sealed to spouse Thomas Frost 9 Jul 2021; Sealing to parents not completed.0
Private message sent with an update on the issue. Please watch for a red dot near the envelope icon in the upper right-hand corner of this page.0