Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Suggest an Idea

baptism vs birth

Deanna Slade
Deanna Slade ✭
December 1, 2022 in Suggest an Idea

Perhaps it would be a good idea to eliminate the birth record, just using the baptismal record which includes both. That way, when someone forgets or overlooks the baptismal dates, they can just be added, instead of reindexing, or if they mistake one for the other, they can be corrected more easily.

1
1
Up Down
1 votes

Active · Last Updated December 1, 2022

Comments

  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    December 1, 2022

    In the part of the world where my ancestors lived, before the latter half of the 1800s, most church registers record only the date of the sacrament (baptism, burial), not of the vital event (birth, death) that led to it.

    2
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    December 1, 2022

    Same in the area where my families lived - only in the late 19th century and early 20th do we start to see a birth date on a baptismal record.

    0
  • Gordon Collett
    Gordon Collett ✭✭✭✭✭
    December 1, 2022

    It sounds like you are strictly speaking about indexing projects. Is that what you actually are talking about? If so, are there specific indexing projects where you see a problem that not indexing birth information would solve?

    2
  • LauraleeT1
    LauraleeT1 mod
    December 1, 2022

    @Deanna Slade Gordon makes a very good point, the more information you can give us around the problem the better.

    1
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 30.1K All Categories
  • 24.3K FamilySearch Help
  • 127 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 443 FamilySearch Center
  • 465 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.5K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.7K Indexing
  • 639 Memories
  • 6.6K Temple
  • 326 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups