Someone confused the 1920 Census document pages because of same barrio name in 2 different municipio
Someone confused the 1920 Census document pages and they put the image / original documents of Barrio Calabazas, Yabucoa, Puerto Rico into the Barrio Calabazas, San Sebastian, Puerto Rico section. It is wrong.
1. See here: https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GRFM-R5Q?i=28&cc=1488411
2. The heading of the source states "United States Census, 1920 Puerto Rico San Sebastian Calabazas ED 363 " which means Barrio Calabazas, San Sebastian, Puerto Rico.
3. However, when you look at the image indexed (the text at the bottom of the screen listing the person's names, ages, etc) of the individual records supposedly from the 1920 PR San Sebastian Barrio Calabazas census they do not "match" the names on the document.
In other words, the details typed by volunteers do not match at all the original 1920 Census document page.
4. None of the text matches the actual image / document ... This is because there are Barrios in Puerto Rico with same names. There is a Barrio Calabazas, in San Sebastian municipio and there is a Barrio Calabazas in Yabucoa municipio...
Please review.
Comments
-
This is another instance of the placename auto-standardization problem.
See this thread for more detail on the subject: https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/132408/how-to-have-record-locations-corrected#latest
0 -
"Auto" / bots can't do a good job then?
It's sad that the records have been messed up like this.
How can it be fixed?
0
