Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Temple

It's time to return to expiring reservations, based upon temple district.

Don D Madsen
Don D Madsen ✭
September 1, 2022 edited December 7, 2022 in Temple

The expiration of temple reservations has been suspended "until all temples fully reopen". I believe this policy is no longer appropriate as the majority of temples have fully reopened. Furthermore, with COVID mutations and surges it could be years before we see 100% of temples fully reopened.

I think the expiration of reservations should be based upon the status of the temple that a person is assigned to. For example, if someone lives in the Provo Temple district and their temple is fully reopened, I think that person's reservations should expire, per the pre-pandemic policy.

Tagged:
  • Temple Ideas
  • Active
  • Temple
  • releasing reservations
2

Comments

  • Stephanie Spencer Booth
    Stephanie Spencer Booth ✭
    December 6, 2022

    I totally agree. This is a great idea!

    There are so many ordinances reserved in 2017 and 2018 that should have expired by now, but the expiration dates are still moving forward everyday. It totally defeats the purpose of the expiration dates. We need to get the work done, not hoard reservations.

    1
  • Maile L
    Maile L mod
    February 2

    Have you seen the 17 Jan 2023 article Expirations for Ordinance Reservations to Resume?

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 29.9K All Categories
  • 24.1K FamilySearch Help
  • 122 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 442 FamilySearch Center
  • 460 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.4K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.6K Indexing
  • 634 Memories
  • 6.5K Temple
  • 321 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups