Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Family Tree

Comments on new page!

David Slatter
David Slatter ✭✭
August 22, 2022 edited July 12, 2024 in Family Tree
  1. The banner is too big and needs the option to change colors.
  2. The timeline is missing the child's name.
  3. There needs to be a feedback button that takes you right to the comment section.
2

Answers

  • David Slatter
    David Slatter ✭✭
    August 22, 2022

    The "Unfinished Attachments" warring on the source page does not show up!

    1
  • lyleblunttoronto1
    lyleblunttoronto1 ✭✭✭✭
    August 22, 2022

    @David Slatter please join the new person page discussion in this group

    https://community.familysearch.org/en/group/316-new-person-page


    Posts in the group are easier for Engineers, UX and QA to find.

    0
  • larsenmindy
    larsenmindy ✭
    August 22, 2022

    The "Life Sketch" used to be at the very top of the Person Page and now it is located at the bottom. In my opinion it helps to have it at the top so that critical identifying information can be addressed in the beginning lines so that a less experienced person getting on familysearch can see quickly see whether the existing person matches their relative. For example, maybe there has been confusion already about a person who has a common name or a similar name to someone else and in the past there has been discussion about whether that is the same, "John Brown". In the first sentence of the Life Sketch it could be emphasized that the person in the page is son of and list parents (good identifier) or maybe that he is the John Brown from such and such a location and not the one from the other. Bottomline, I think the Life Sketch can be a quick qualifier for who someone is and should be at the top of the page so that it is viewed with the first glance of a person page. I strongly think that it should remain at the top of the page.

    1
  • Steve 1
    Steve 1 ✭
    August 22, 2022

    There seems to be no real purpose in making the change, and it just confuses patrons. If something's not broken, why make such a change. Upsets many patrons.

    0
  • David Slatter
    David Slatter ✭✭
    August 23, 2022

    I agree with larsenmindy. A field at the top for identifying information would be very helpful.

    0
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 43K Ask a Question
  • 3.4K General Questions
  • 571 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.8K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 644 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 1K Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 476 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups