Mistake in 'mouse over' explanation for 'reserved' vs 'shared by' person
A patron just pointed out that in their list of 'to be printed' ordinances, when they mouse over the remaining ordinances to be performed it shows the original sharer as the 'reserved by' person and that this confuses them thinking they shouldn't be printing those ordinances.
Hopefully this observation can be addressed and updated so that patrons aren't confused/kept from following thru with ordinances.
This should not change. Too many patrons still don’t understand the difference between 90 day and 2 year ordinances and need every possible reminder that they did not reserve the 90 day ones. They only borrowed those and implicitly promised the person who did reserve them that they would complete them within 90 days.
This, of course, will be less of an issue when expiration dates are back in force. From posts here by people who clearly just gather up 90 ordinances, I suspect that when ordinances do start expiring that many people will find their reservation lists shrink dramatically0