Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› 1950 US Census

Signature box with dash and comma

System
System admin
April 27 in 1950 US Census
This discussion was created from comments split from: What do you do when you have questions? (How to find the FAQ now).
0

Comments

  • Pluperfect
    Pluperfect ✭
    April 22

    The Enumerator's Signature is always written as a "signature". But the computer has often recorded it with a dash and comma beginning, then a surname, Should we enter it as it shows on the actual record?

    0
  • AndLinda
    AndLinda mod
    April 22

    @Pluperfect , thank you for your question. You can leave the dash and coma out. We appreciate your wanting to make the record accurate.

    0
  • Schex9
    Schex9 ✭
    April 25
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/445796#Comment_445796

    Type out the Enumerator's Signature as you see it written

    0
  • AndLinda
    AndLinda mod
    April 25

    @Schex9, yes, the Field Help does state that, so the instructions need to be clarified as some look at the comma and dash as being in the "box" and should go with the name. But that is incorrect as it is just talking about the "signature" and making sure it matches the field. It has been suggested to refine the instructions.

    https://www.familysearch.org/en/info/1950-census-details

    "For the most part, you should type what you see and delete information that doesn’t belong".

    https://www.familysearch.org/en/help/helpcenter/article/help-with-reviewing-document-headers-in-the-1950-us-census

    In this article it is quoted: The Document Header Review is a simple activity that asks you to verify that the computer copied the information in the census header correctly. Correct any anomalies that you see.

    • Delete names from the name field when the field in the image is blank.
    • Delete commas that come after the given names in the name field.
    • For the date field, enter exactly what you see.


    0
  • CaptBob
    CaptBob ✭✭✭
    April 25

    I simply wonder WHY this signature is even indexed. Has one discovered a genealogical value to it??

    Yes, I understand that 'Ancestry' has set the criteria for this process BUT doesn't FS have any 'control'?

    In the name of EFFICIENCY can they not severely limit these requirements of the multitude of trivia being required & work toward an efficient completion of the indexing review of Family Review.

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 22.6K All Categories
  • 347 1950 US Census
  • 45.9K FamilySearch Help
  • 90 Get Involved
  • 2.3K General Questions
  • 326 Family History Centers
  • 322 FamilySearch Account
  • 3.1K Family Tree
  • 2.5K Search
  • 3.6K Indexing
  • 427 Memories
  • 4.2K Temple
  • 249 Other Languages
  • 28 Community News
  • 5.3K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups