Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› 1950 US Census

Review Families: Street Name (Field 1) being skipped

MinnWisRoots
MinnWisRoots ✭✭✭
April 25 edited April 26 in 1950 US Census

When in Nevada, it did not include Field on in the data to be reviewed. I checked Indiana and Oregon and it was there. Don't know if it is just Nevada or more stats are involved.

Did post Feedback for the individual family.

@AndLinda or another Moderator please confirm problem to Tech.

1

Comments

  • ME Doran
    ME Doran mod
    April 25

    @MinnWisRoots I will post this in an internal memo to be sure that it is noted. Do you have Screenshot?

    0
  • Robert W Andersen
    Robert W Andersen ✭
    April 26


    0
  • Robert W Andersen
    Robert W Andersen ✭
    April 26

    I've had several instances where some family members have their surname fields missing. I report them in the feedback, but it's frustrating.

    0
  • Sam Sulser
    Sam Sulser mod
    April 26

    Closed at request of original poster.

    0
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 23.8K All Categories
  • 514 1950 US Census
  • 46.8K FamilySearch Help
  • 100 Get Involved
  • 2.3K General Questions
  • 347 Family History Centers
  • 347 FamilySearch Account
  • 3.4K Family Tree
  • 2.6K Search
  • 3.7K Indexing
  • 452 Memories
  • 4.6K Temple
  • 265 Other Languages
  • 29 Community News
  • 5.5K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups