Why is it not important to correct mistakes that are made regarding temple ordinances dates??

James Reed Smith

Brett .

All

FYI

Related ( EARLIER / PREVIOUS ) 'Post' ...

FamilySearch Help

'Category' = Temple

HOME > FAMILYSEARCH HELP > TEMPLE

Today I talked to a volunteer about an error with my uncles family. There were two issues that I enc

https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/122381/today-i-talked-to-a-volunteer-about-an-error-with-my-uncles-family-there-were-two-issues-that-i-enc

https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/122381/today-i-talked-to-a-volunteer-about-an-error-with-my-uncles-family-there-were-two-issues-that-i-enc

Brett

Brett .

@James Reed Smith

James

I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...

[ And, I happen to be a Member of the Church ... ]

Just in passing ...

Please be, aware; and, advised, that ...

It is IMPORTANT, to have "Temple" Work, CORRECTED, to the Older ( ie. Earlier ) 'Dated' Work.

Of course, provided, that the Older ( ie. Earlier ) 'Dated' Work, can be substantiated ...

eg. "Copy"/"Image" of,

▬ OLDER Versions, of "Family Group Sheets", with the "Processing" reference, of "Temple" Work; and/or.

▬ "Temple" Cards, with, the "Mark" (ie. "Tick"); and, "Stamp", of a "Temple"; and/or,

▬ A SIMILAR (possibly, "Duplicate") individual/person, in "Family Tree", of 'FamilySearch'

And ...

In such cases, 'FamilySearch' "Support", makes every effort, to ensure, that "Temple" Work, is CORRECTED, to the Older ( ie. Earlier ) 'Dated' Work, where such is available (and, can be substantiated).

Just my thoughts.

I hope, that this may help/assist, somewhat.

Brett

James Reed Smith

Thank you for your help. I certainly understand mistakes. But also like to correct them when they are found. When I reported to the help line the issue I was surprised that they did not want to go to effort to make corrections as I felt that they would appreciate the identification of the problem.

DMS1737

@James Reed Smith

Private message sent to guest