FamilySearch. ChangeLog. WHY. Are RECORDS, Showing NON-STANDARD; But, NO Corresponding CORRECTION?
FamilySearch
[ Cross-Posted: in 'Categories' of (1) "Suggest an Idea"; and, (2) "General Questions" ]
Subject:
"ChangeLog". WHY. Are RECORDS, Showing as NON-STANDARD; But, there is NO Corresponding ( Later ) CORRECTION (or, "Standardisation")?
BACKGROUND
In the "ChangeLog", for an individual/person ...
This NOW appears ...
ie.
But, there is NO record, of the "Vitals" of either, "Birth"; and/or, "Death", appearing further along/up the "ChangeLog", that indicates, that those "Vitals", were ( Ever ) CORRECTED / "Standardised".
Hence ...
REQUEST
For clarification ...
In regards to the "ChangeLog", for an individual/person ...
Question(s):
WHY, are RECORDS, showing as NON-STANDARD; But, there is NO Corresponding ( Later - further, "Up" the "ChangeLog" ) CORRECTION (or, "Standardisation")?
Is this a FAULT / FLAW?
Or, is this by "Design"?
[ As, the above, appears to be quite inconstant - and, just plain WRONG ... ]
Furthermore ...
Has this, got ANYTHING to do with, the "Improve Place Names" Project; and, the 'Username' of "Volunteer Project"?
Please advise.
Humbly submitted for your, information; attention; and, consideration.
'Thank You' in advance.
Your cooperation, would be greatly appreciated.
Kind Regards
MAY THE LORD BLESS YOU IN THIS IMPORTANT WORK
Yours Faithfully,
Brett
Addendum:
FYI
It is a FAULT / FLAW ...
It WOULD appear ...
That a RECENT "System" Release/Upgrade, HAS "Changed", the 'Status', of the ORIGINAL, "Birth" (and/or, "Christening"); and, "Death", Records, for ALL individuals/persons, in 'Family Tree", to indicate "Non-standardized Date and Place"; even, when they were, acceptable; and, a "Standard" (ie. NOT requiring "Standardisation").
And ...
This was for BOTH, "Old"; and, "New", individuals/persons ...
I checked on an individual/person, that I ONLY "Created" Two (x2) Days ago ...
Both, the ORIGINAL, "Birth"; and, "Death" Records, NOW indicate "Non-standardized Date and Place"; even, though I KNOW (ie. 1000%) that they were, acceptable; and, a "Standard" (ie. NOT requiring "Standardisation"), when I input/entered them just Two (x2) Days ago.
Plus, MY Parents; where, the ORIGINAL (and, subsequent "Changes" to), "Birth"; and, "Death" Records, NOW indicate "Non-standardized Date and Place"; even, though I KNOW (ie. 1000%) that they were ALL, acceptable; and, a "Standard" (ie. NOT requiring "Standardisation") , when I input/entered them.
Now ...
That Confirmed ...
That IS a "Major" DISCREPANCY, that NEEDS, to be RECTIFIED --- ASAP.
DEFINITELY a SCREW-UP ...
This HAS become, more of a NIGHTMARE, than IT was TRYING to address ...
All because, 'FamilySearch', DID NOT use, the "Contact Name", of the likes of, "FamilySearch, Standardisation".
[ For the "Improve Place Names" Project ... ]
Rather than, the likes of the 'Contact Name', of "Volunteer Project".
UGH ...
Brett
.